dlsspy

50 ms·

421.
by dlsspy 17y ago
Statistically, I'd assume so.
422.
Hello World in Go -- A Memcached Server(dustin.github.com)
53 points by dlsspy 17y ago|14 comments
423.
by dlsspy 17y ago
They've done tech talks and the like on it, but I'd strongly recommend anyone intending to write software to read this: http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html This topic is mostly section 3.3, but there's a lot to test.
424.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I'm not convinced I like the methodology, but I do like the question. I've done some similar testing of my own to see what the performance impact of using libraries' mechanisms for flushing writes to disk and found I could get pretty decent
425.
by dlsspy 17y ago
If you go to stackoverflow, you'll see tons of people actively recommending new projects start using subversion for various reasons. I have a skewed view of the world, I believe. I use the tools that solve my problems the best and don't
426.
by dlsspy 17y ago
Where binary == closed source. Imagine a binary-only distribution of some application that runs on all hardware platforms (because we get that a lot in OS X and we used to get it on NeXTSTEP as well).
427.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I wrote this thing for myself: http://dustin.github.com/whatsup/
428.
by dlsspy 17y ago
You didn't mention micro-usb. I have within one meter of me, devices that require USB type A ("regular"), USB type B ("square"), mini USB, micro USB and an iPhone.
429.
by dlsspy 17y ago
The train was unfamiliar to me when I stopped driving to work, but it was pretty easy to figure out and I no longer fear killing people when I fall asleep.
430.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I ported it and have an installer for Snow Leopard: http://dustin.github.com/2009/10/23/mac-zfs.html
431.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I don't care much for them until they stop fighting with boxee.
432.
by dlsspy 17y ago
> Thoughts on releasing this as an open source project? The only reason I'd say you shouldn't release something as an open source project is if you strongly feel that someone is going to hand you a sufficient amount of cash to keep it
433.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I used this thing: http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnigraphsketcher/
434.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I tell my kids that everyone is weird. The people who scare me are the ones who have no visible signs of it.
435.
by dlsspy 17y ago
...approximately October 5th 1995. spy.net was requested before it was announced that they were charging, but they grandfathered us in anyway. :) Of course, like an old fogey, I'll state that it was all downhill from there. The ``one org
436.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I actually made good use of this on a hacking trip with poor connectivity. It's really a nice system.
437.
by dlsspy 17y ago
So wait, if I stick my hand in there, it will hurt it?
438.
by dlsspy 17y ago
see also: http://couch.io/ These kinds of services are pretty neat.
439.
by dlsspy 17y ago
New accounts is ~400 day, new repos is 1,000. I get your point. But I don't think number of web servers out there capable of also being subversion repositories is the greatest metric, either.
440.
by dlsspy 17y ago
The benefits of having software on Joel should be self-evident.
441.
by dlsspy 17y ago
It'd be interesting to see that subversion graph vs. a git one. I don't know how to find all git repos on the planet, but github is claiming 1,000 new repositories per day last month: http://github.com/blog/493-github-is-moving-to-rackspa
442.
by dlsspy 17y ago
Sure it's obvious until you have hundreds of millions of nodes that each link to somewhere between 100 and 2,000,000 other nodes that need to be updated when any given node updates (assume around 5,000 nodes are updating every second with a
443.
by dlsspy 17y ago
> Github never locks you in. That's why I started giving them money the first day they would accept it, but it's not entirely true anymore. The wiki has been the most obvious case for a very long time now. They just need to sit down an
444.
by dlsspy 17y ago
That's pretty common here in the US, as well.
445.
by dlsspy 17y ago
You forgot "acquired." It was them . Those bastards we bought. I mean, sure that was almost a year ago, and most of the original employees are gone, but do keep in mind when we're talking about this that it's not a proper MS offering. Un
446.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I just use a shim.
447.
by dlsspy 17y ago
I had a small change sitting in a branch for about a month and wanted to update. I didn't want to do a merge. I did find that someone had created a simple rebase plugin for bzr, though. That made things a lot easier. I tend to commit lot
448.
by dlsspy 17y ago
bzr's UI confuses the hell out of me. I have friends who know it really well and I usually ask them how to do things that are simple in git. In some cases I just hear that they would rather not do that [thing that is important to me]. As
449.
by dlsspy 17y ago
> 1. Git needs a shared-library interface, so that interfaces to git can be built without quoting and parsing (the two most error-prone operations in computing). Every special tool I've ever wanted to create in git I've been able to do
450.
by dlsspy 17y ago
> It just always leaves that old sour taste of "it should be easier than that". git branch branch-i-should-have-made git reset --hard origin/master How would you make it easier? Why is that kludgy? > So, do you know th

More ›