dlbucci

21 ms·

181.
by dlbucci 10y ago
jpeg.io may have lost on sharp lines, but it had WAY fewer artifacts than either of the other exports, and the blue was closer to the original compared to the Photoshop export. In my opinion, it's a better quality image.
182.
by dlbucci 10y ago
.enter() was sort of confusing for me at first, but you lose the data-binding goodness of D3 if you drop it. I think the real issue is that the tutorials don't really explain it correctly: .enter() is where you add things and make cha
183.
by dlbucci 10y ago
Found the CMU grad! I think this is very different from a splay tree, though. Open-address tables take advantage of the cache by removing linked lists from the data structure, which is why I think they tend to have good real-world perform
184.
by dlbucci 10y ago
CoffeeScript has a feature like that, where a constructor can call parameters `@whatever` and they will be assigned to the object. For all the ways CoffeeScript borrows from Python, but somehow makes it worse, that feature is actually very
185.
by dlbucci 10y ago
According to the article, that's not really a fair comparison. The first example would need functools and at least 3 more methods to get to the same functionality of the latter example, at which point I think the former is less reada
186.
by dlbucci 10y ago
We've been using Druid ( http://druid.io ) at work for just that and I think we're generally pretty happy with it. It's column-oriented though, so while it's good for metrics and aggregations, you're neve
187.
by dlbucci 10y ago
At this point, I'd settle for JSON5 ( http://json5.org/ ), which says any JSON that's a valid ECMAScript 5 object is valid JSON (including trailing commas, unquoted keys, single quote strings, and comments). I don&
188.
by dlbucci 10y ago
I've been wanting to use these in some of my CSS, but I had never considered the case where a browser supports a feature, but doesn't support `@supports`. My best guess is you'd need a three stage CSS file to support that: f
189.
by dlbucci 10y ago
I think he's referring to the newer manifest.json files: https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/
190.
by dlbucci 11y ago
This is a custom distribution of FlashDevelop, which I loved working with when I had a PC. I still prefer working on a Unix-like OS, but I would recommend this to anyone developing on Windows!
191.
by dlbucci 11y ago
I think this actually happened in Ex Machina. There's a coding scene, and if you run the program the character writes, it points you to the ISBN for a book on AI.
192.
by dlbucci 11y ago
This is apparently different and separate from Mozilla's manifest.webapp (which I guess is for Firefox OS?), but I don't know if it's a standardization of Chrome's manifest.json that I've seen elsewhere or something
193.
by dlbucci 11y ago
"There is no "document.createElement" in the Javascript spec." Uh... https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/cr...