dkshdkjshdk

15 ms·

31.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> I’m not even trying to argue that uniswap is not useful or an improvement. Sorry, I misread what you wrote, then. > Instead I’m pointing out that when we compare defi protocols to the traditional system, the core services are largel
32.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> The first thing I would do is look outside to collect information on who in outside thereby infringing their privacy. Looking at someone doesn't infringe on their privacy. Taking a picture of that someone and storing it in a perma
33.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> Yes you can provide liquidity for eur-usd if you jump through all the hoops . The emphasized part is important. Most people either can't or don't know how to jump through these hoops. Is it even worth it to jump through thes
34.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
Maybe you can find some here: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=zksnark
35.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> “mint,” new tokens when prices are too high by posting collateral You can "run away", but the collateral stays.
36.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> If you take away all the buzzwords you’ll notice that the core utility of uniswap is the “decentralization” of services which are offered by the traditional finance system. If I contact my bank, will they allow me to become a liquidity
37.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> Now that the UK is independent, it no longer has the paralysis/compromise/status quo dilemma. ...so they can now pass all the strong surveillance laws they want without being hindered by the EU? My point: "paralysis&quot
38.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
> Sure, but my point is that if exogenous hormonal puberty becomes common enough (like, 50% of the population opts in to them), you can end up in a situation where in aggregate there are no measurable differences. You have equal numbers
39.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
I understand what you're trying to say but, in this situation you are describing, the "good predictor" is not really your self-identified gender, but whether you were subjected or not to a "male-like" hormone profil
40.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
He said "your #1", making reference to the first book in OPs list: "Numerical Optimization" by Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright. It's pretty fun to read.
41.
by dkshdkjshdk 5y ago
As a scientist who does not need extra brownie points, this is exactly what I'm doing: every single review request coming from an Elsevier publication is ignored. And, yes, it is the quality of peer review (i.e. the work done by unpa