Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dkdcio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
181.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
I also find it useful to keep in mind (often more junior) people are learning new things and expressing their joy, which is a good thing. and most (junior) people learning things in tech right now are doing so in the context of AI, for bett
182.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
I’m really confused how you got that from the comment you’re replying to, and why you’re continuing to defend misinformation you’re spreading in the original comment. you implied TI primarily makes money from calculators and MSP430s. this i
183.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> calculators and MSP430s for remote power meters are keeping TI from closing up shop calculators have consistently been a minor percentage of TI’s business (~5% of profits per source below). I doubt MSP430s in particular amount to a hug
184.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
still reading but you got a typo: “ reducntionism”
185.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
sure, I do, I was responding to someone who asked why not use uvx to run ruff
186.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
that’s a bit slow typically
187.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
the modern internet is a magical place! we should ban advertisement to end this nonsense and waste of everybody’s time
188.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
how much profit does Cursor generate on that revenue?
189.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
you can turn off your watch history and YouTube becomes a lot better
190.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
this is a wild position. it would have taken you the same amount of time to type your question(s) into your favorite search engine or LLM to learn what the terms mean as you now have spent on this comment thread. the idea that every article
191.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
every hackernews thread on this topic has like 10 of those people and it genuinely baffles me. like in the year 2025 the idea that you need to see an ad to know to buy something you were otherwise unaware of is genuinely insane to me
192.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
yeah that’s fair — I’ll write them ip more cogently :) I am confident you are mistaken
193.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
jfc this is what I’ve been looking for, thank you. I’m coming from a more systems theory perspective this meshes well with
194.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
use Termius (shell client for iOS devices). put your phone and laptop/desktop on the same VPN. SSH in, use Claude Code normally from anywhere
195.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> Another useful property of the model is interpretability. Is this true? my understanding is the hard part about interpreting neural networks is that there are many many neurons, with many many interconnections, not that the activation
196.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> Why not? If humans store data in their brains, isn't that learning? No. We’re back to my earlier point of you and I have fundamentally different understanding of cognition, intelligence, and learning. And genuinely not trying to b
197.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
that’s not learning…we have a fundamentally different understanding of what cognition, intelligence, and learning are adding text to storage and searching over it is not memory. “knowing” those things about you is not learning. and guess wh
198.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
from previous reading up on this, it is my understanding this was most likely for show for the committee (this was public information after all) and was not a real device used, because it could not work skimming this article is also seems b
199.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> It has a beginning, a middle, and an end. The conversation can refer to earlier parts of the conversation. How is that not a "temporal context"? This is not what I mean for a few reasons: 1. This context literally has limits;
200.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
well the second part (implied above, I didn’t actually write it) is “and operate intelligently in that world”. talking about “intelligence” in some abstract form where “does this text output constitute intelligence” is hyper silly to me. th
201.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
fair enough —- I need to read up more on the usage, but I find it surprising for “planned economy” to imply the former
202.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
to answer your first question, no, that is not what I’m saying. for your second question, you’re entirely missing the point of mine a LLM cannot actually be intelligent if it cannot operate in a temporal context ;)
203.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
if it’s not actually living it’s not making intelligent decisions. if I make a grocery list, and go to my store, and the store isn’t there, what do I do? I make an intelligent decision about what to do next (probably investigating wtf happe
204.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> I see statements like this a lot, and I find them unpersuasive because any meaningful definition of "intelligence" is not offered. What, exactly, is the property that humans (allegedly) have and LLMs (allegedly) lack, that al
205.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
"A planned economy would be some government committee deciding what specific startups and how many of them should be started up in any give year, and no one else can create a startup." no it would not be...where is this definition
206.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
> Databricks recently spent $1 billion to acquire Neon, a startup building a serverless Postgres. Snowflake also spent about $250 million to acquire Crunchy Data, a veteran enterprise-grade Postgres provider. It's kinda funny to not
207.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
I did something similar after copy/pasting Markdown into a Google Doc, assuming Gemini could obviously convert the section headers and such…nope! combined with separate plans to use the Gemini CLI, it’s an incredibly goofy situation
208.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
the military industrial complex? if only we were warned…
209.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
FWIW I learned Perl in 2016, and it became my language of choice (sorta) for ~6 months, but the overwhelming momentum of Python is hard to avoid. Perl was/is cool though!
210.
▲
by
dkdcio
1y ago
I prefer "more time, shorter letter"
More ›