dkdcio

8 ms·

61.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
that is fair —- you’re claiming this person has a pattern of lazy, low-effort comments. I didn’t check and if you’re right, I appreciate you calling it out just as you’re annoyed by low-effort LLM posts/comments, I’m annoyed by low-eff
62.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
A) you cannot tell B) you have said nothing productive toward discussion, you’ve just accused someone of using a tool (that you don’t know if they used) I’d prefer actual criticism of the content. (I cannot downvote and would not if I could
63.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
the HN feed is an algorithm. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. also all include “crowd sourced ranking” in their algorithms the difference is the incentive (what the algorithm is optimized for). in most of these feeds it’s for ad revenue, he
64.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
iphone :/ I see others with the same problem too, oh well, at least people won’t accuse me of being an LLM probably
65.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
this feels incomplete without mentioning why everything is trying to keep our attention: paid digital advertisement. remove the incentive for the slopfest and “the algorithm” becomes far less of a problem (see HackerNews)
66.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
similar for me —- also how do you get the proper double dashes —- anyway, I’d love to be able to run CLI agents fully local, but I don’t see it being good enough (relative to what you can get for pretty cheap from SOTA models) anytime soon
67.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
yeah I have a “meta” skill and often use it after a session to instruct CC to update its own skills/rules. get the flywheel going
68.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
it’s also for (typically) longer context you don’t always want the agent to have in its context. if you always want it in context, use rules (memories) but if it’s something more involved or less frequently used (perhaps some debugging meth
69.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
ask, receive! https://github.com/anthropics/skills not ranked with comments but I’d expect solid quality from these and they should “just work” in Codex etc.
70.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
or read your favorite sci-fi novel, or watch Terminator. this is pure bs by a charlatan
71.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
fear mongering science fiction, you may as well cite Dune or Terminator
72.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
I also enjoy the implication everyone has had decades to do something about journalism —- I’ve barely been an adult for a decade, my bad I guess!
73.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
much better :) bot-like even!
74.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
now THIS is pod racing! :)
75.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
In my experience, people who bombard threads with insults based on the technology people use (a specific set of neural networks in this case) are…well, don’t have much better to do in life. you openly advocated for insulting and bullying pe
76.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
I like that analogy a lot. FWIW I also find myself learning a lot more at a higher rate with LLM usage
77.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
np, it is a hobby horse of mine to point this out in case people are reading and haven’t thought about the difference in some of these algorithms and others
78.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
> push back by insulting AI idiots you on another comment in here lol you’re blinded by the hate! let it flow through you! insult the users of the bad neural nets until the world heals! don’t back down!
79.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
they called me an idiot in the other thread for pointing out AI is broader than just LLMs (after they called everyone that uses AI an idiot) lol they’re clearly very angry and bitter, and I believe this is not the first account they’ve made
80.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
I just wanted to clarify only some neural networks are bad :) technical precision of language is important to avoid confusion sorry you’re so angry though. best of luck
81.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
by AI you mean LLMs right? I use a neural network to blur my background on Zoom calls, among other non-LLM usage
82.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
it’s linked in the blog, but the prior post is great on its own too: https://terriblesoftware.org/2025/12/11/ai-can-write-your-co... it does seem like the skepticism is fading. I do think engineers that outri
83.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
> algorithm-driven hackernews is algorithm-driven too; the difference is incentives (namely paid ads)
84.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
…except we know what every neuron in a neural network is doing. I ask again, what criteria do we need to meet for you to claim we know how LLMs work? we know the equations, we know the numbers going through a network, we know the universal
85.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
you conveniently ignored the most important part of my comment :) > Such as? changelog is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELO... glhf btw you started this thread with pu
86.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
it’s the “agentic harness” — they have shipped tons of great features for the DevEx, but it’s the combination of better models (Sonnet 4.5 1M, now Opus 4.5) and the “prompting”/harness that improves how it actually performs again I’m n
87.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
lol bold claim initially for not using the primary competitor in months. I try to use all 3 (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI); there are tradeoffs between all 3
88.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
those systems include humans —- they are put in place by humans (or collections of them) that are the accountability sink if you put them (without humans) in a forrest they would not survive and evolve (they are not viable systems alone); t
89.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
you are correct, I instinctively dismissed that as an ad and saw the paywall. my bad! edit: eh yeah as you say there’s also an ad. my logic is “this looks cool, I’d like to learn about this” => click => “oh you’re just trying to sell
90.
by dkdcio 10mo ago
I can’t read the article

More ›