dkasper

53 ms·

541.
by dkasper 17y ago
Carrying that train of thought further, they should integrate with Apple's App Store. Everyone on a mac uses iTunes anyway, why should they have to install Steam separately?
542.
Founders at Work Interview 2: Weebly - Live Now(justin.tv)
1 points by dkasper 17y ago|0 comments
543.
by dkasper 17y ago
Hypothesis: if you find that you have a balanced life you'll eventually get burned out on that too and shift the balance.
544.
by dkasper 17y ago
What general computing tasks are you referring to? Most people's daily computing tasks involve web browsing and email or social networking, things the iPhone does and presumably iPad will do quite well. Also what is wrong with touch display
545.
by dkasper 17y ago
nice pun!
546.
by dkasper 17y ago
Thanks for the clarification, that makes more sense.
547.
by dkasper 17y ago
"You don't want to rest on your laurels, but it's likely that you're never going to take in less revenue next month than you did the previous one." Bull. If that were true then companies that charge subscriptions would never go out of busin
548.
by dkasper 17y ago
Important to realize he is using the term "geeks" to refer to smart people as a whole (not techies). After that the article makes a lot more sense.
549.
by dkasper 17y ago
Your points are valid concerns, however the article is about highway speed limits. We could remove highway limits while maintaining them inside neighborhoods.
550.
by dkasper 17y ago
Are you serious? Yellow was an in color last year.
551.
Monetizing Your Online Community in Every Possible Way(blog.therisetothetop.com)
3 points by dkasper 17y ago|0 comments
552.
Rob Dyrdek - America's Coolest Workplace(inc.com)
2 points by dkasper 17y ago|0 comments
553.
Timothy Sykes on Investimonials.com (Yelp-like reviews for investments/finance)(youtube.com)
1 points by dkasper 17y ago|0 comments
554.
by dkasper 17y ago
Care to explain this a little more?
555.
Is the iPad for dumb people?(calebelston.com)
51 points by dkasper 17y ago|79 comments
556.
by dkasper 17y ago
I guess I can understand why they don't want to fund games, but, correct me if I'm wrong, aren't they the largest grossing category in the app store?
557.
by dkasper 17y ago
I agree and would predict that in the future all of Apple's computers will be touch screens. They've already done away with the mouse buttons on their laptops to get a bigger touchpad, and it seems like the next evolution of that is a full
558.
by dkasper 17y ago
Transportation infrastructure is a great investment in the future: where would we be today without our highway system? With air travel becoming more of a hassle each year it'll be great to have an alternative. Note that about 8 billion in t
559.
by dkasper 17y ago
I'm a no name iPhone developer and the most recent app I released was approved in ~2 biz days. This was my second app. The first time it took over a week (around 6 months ago).
560.
The Internet of 2009 in numbers(royal.pingdom.com)
34 points by dkasper 17y ago|14 comments
561.
HarperCollins in talks with Apple for eBook publishing on its upcoming tablet(online.wsj.com)
1 points by dkasper 17y ago|0 comments
562.
by dkasper 17y ago
That is of course the correct solution ;-)
563.
by dkasper 17y ago
On a related note update the copyright date on your websites to 2010! I updated ours at JTV on Friday, Youtube is so 2009 :-)
564.
by dkasper 17y ago
OnPoint has some of the most interesting topics and guests of any show I've ever listened to and the discussion is notoriously civil. Also today's episode looks interesting: "Google v. China" http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/01/google-vs-c
565.
If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)(protocolostomy.com)
41 points by dkasper 17y ago|24 comments
566.
Who is Android's customer?(calebelston.com)
26 points by dkasper 17y ago|29 comments
567.
MyTown is bigger than Foursquare and Gowalla (6x as many checkins)(techcrunch.com)
2 points by dkasper 17y ago|1 comments
568.
by dkasper 17y ago
Someone is still going to control all that infrastructure no matter how cheap it gets. The content will be controlled by the users more than it is now (premium content/celebrities will still draw the most eyeballs), but the backends will st
569.
by dkasper 17y ago
False, people will just have to buy less stuff.
570.
by dkasper 17y ago
Perhaps he's thinking things seem to be regressing back to those days.

More ›