djbebs

14 ms·

31.
by djbebs 4y ago
Copyright addresses no issue, it only causes them.
32.
by djbebs 4y ago
Pretty sure he was surprised no parents had blown one of the CPS people heads clean off in their front lawn when they came around to take their kids.
33.
by djbebs 4y ago
Sounds like they were stealing the customers deposits in order to provide those margin services then.
34.
by djbebs 4y ago
The content is uncopyrightable...
35.
by djbebs 4y ago
Obesity declining with income doesn't mean less calorically intense food is cheaper, it just means that higher income better educated people eat less calories.
36.
by djbebs 4y ago
It doesn’t reduce the time to enter the country anymore than blocking your front door unless you pay a toll reduces your time to exit the building.
37.
by djbebs 4y ago
Why should people not be able to sell what they own freely?
38.
by djbebs 4y ago
Are you banning the us flag?
39.
by djbebs 4y ago
There is nothing wrong with stock buybacks, and the only people negatively affected by them are the investors who own the business.
40.
by djbebs 4y ago
The government shouldn't be taking any side.
41.
by djbebs 4y ago
Theft is a crime regardless of what is being stolen, so is fraud. No need for regulation to deal with this.
42.
by djbebs 4y ago
Depends on the price and conditions.
43.
by djbebs 4y ago
If FTX Terms of Service state that customer assets belong to the customer--not to FTX and those assets are used by FTX for any purpose that is a crime. Full stop.
44.
by djbebs 4y ago
If they would prefer to be unemployed, they can do it regardless of whether amazon retail exists or not
45.
by djbebs 4y ago
That's the same as in europe, except perhaps that in europe often specific unions are associated with specific political parties and act in conjunction.
46.
by djbebs 4y ago
As they should be.
47.
by djbebs 4y ago
Right now. Can you guarantee that will always be the case we'll into the future?
48.
by djbebs 4y ago
Bureaucrats going on a power trip thats about to get struck down by the courts.
49.
by djbebs 4y ago
They don't.
50.
by djbebs 4y ago
Small amounts let you gather up enough capital to reduce the negative impact of emergencies. People who don't have thay ability make mistakes when emergencies inevitably come around. Those 10$ a week after a year is enough to make up a
51.
by djbebs 4y ago
Again, how does the existence of investors making money by providing housing prevent you from providing housing at below market cost? You'll find that it doesn't. That any such restrictions are political decisions not investor dec
52.
by djbebs 4y ago
I'm not asking about tax brackets, I'm asking about percentage of tax burden. Ie: out of all the income taxes paid, which proportion should be paid by the top 1% of people who make 20% of the income.
53.
by djbebs 4y ago
So your stance is that 20% of the income should bear 100% of the taxes? So that 80% of the income should pay 0% of the taxes?
54.
by djbebs 4y ago
Did you miss the existence of decentralized exchanges?
55.
by djbebs 4y ago
And what about the top 1%? Say they have 20% of the income, how much of the total tax burden should they bear? 20%? 25%? 30%?
56.
by djbebs 4y ago
What would you say is a fair amount to tax the rich? Say the top 10% have 50% of the income. How much of a percent of the total tax burden should they be responsible for? 50%? 60%? 70%?
57.
by djbebs 4y ago
I didn't know the laws of physics was what kept the greenbelt around
58.
by djbebs 4y ago
You understand that investors are providing a needed service, right? Their existence in the market doesn't stop you from existing.
59.
by djbebs 4y ago
Pretty much all of them.
60.
by djbebs 4y ago
Did you miss all the times people with mental illnesses have been discriminated and institutionalized?

More ›