diwank

7 ms·

61.
by diwank 1y ago
Exactly! > It uses two interdependent recurrent modules: a *high-level module* for abstract, slow planning and a *low-level module* for rapid, detailed computations. This structure enables HRM to achieve significant computational depth w
62.
Tap into the "Hemingway effect" to finish what you start(bigthinkmedia.substack.com)
27 points by diwank 1y ago|3 comments
63.
Bluefin: Linux Workstation OS(projectbluefin.io)
2 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
64.
The Accidental Art of Writing Shit That Matters(diwank.space)
2 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
65.
Show HN: SteadyText: Deterministic LLMs: Same input → same output, every time(steadytext.julep.ai)
6 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
66.
The Accidental Art of Writing Shit That Matters(diwank.space)
1 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
67.
An early preview of model capabilities – Generalist [video](youtube.com)
2 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
68.
The inaugural Llama Startup Program cohort(ai.meta.com)
1 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
69.
S-Curves and the Bitter Lesson: The Coming AI Plateau(diwank.space)
2 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
70.
by diwank 1y ago
I'd recommend considering applying to the Thiel Fellowship. https://thielfellowship.org/faq
71.
AGI: Levels of Intelligence(diwank.space)
1 points by diwank 1y ago|0 comments
72.
by diwank 1y ago
Compressed it. Thanks for letting me know :)
73.
by diwank 1y ago
In my experience, you’ll run out of Opus usage credits way too quickly on the Pro plan
74.
by diwank 1y ago
yup but: 1. AIDEV-* is easier to visually distinguish, and 2. it is grep-able by the models, so they can "look around" the codebase in one glance
75.
by diwank 1y ago
This isn’t entirely surprising. Language-model “reasoning” is basically the model internally exploring possibilities in token-space. These models are trained on enormous multilingual datasets and optimized purely for next-token prediction,
76.
by diwank 1y ago
Claude Code is a really very different experience. I’d say give it a shot but Opus 4 is a step change
77.
by diwank 1y ago
There are a bunch of different options so it depends on the models you end up liking but the simplest place to start is to get Claude Max $100 tier and use Opus 4 (the others don’t really get you the full experience)
78.
by diwank 1y ago
Thank you! aider is a different beast actually, I found its memory/context handling best in class. Somehow though, I ended up liking Claude Code the most because of its TUI but really a matter of personal preference and workflow
79.
by diwank 1y ago
Have tried everything under the sun at the moment— broadly just two winners (and both have become my daily drivers for different use cases): 1. Claude Code with Opus 4 2. Cursor with Opus 4 or Gemini 2.5 Pro (Windsurf used to be an option
80.
by diwank 1y ago
The risk, in my experience, is to reach a state where you as the dev is not easily able to understand/update the tests. That becomes very tricky
81.
by diwank 1y ago
Yeah absolutely. I’m on their Max sub since last month and I still don’t fully get how many tokens I have etc. Simplest I’d say is: get the $100/mo Max and then npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
82.
by diwank 1y ago
Mostly just good faith during PR reviews. Plus other than Opus 4 models largely flub it and it shows
83.
by diwank 1y ago
that didn't include the testing, that def took a lot longer but at least now my devs don't have an excuse for poorly written tests lol
84.
by diwank 1y ago
yeah, the max subscription comes in two tiers, $100 gets you 5x the tokens than pro (which only has sonent) and the $200 gets you 20x. doing the math for tokens is kinda annoying and not straightforward atm. they also have a "hybrid&qu
85.
by diwank 1y ago
yeah, this might change in the future but I also found that since building features has become faster, asking devs to write the tests themselves sort of demands that they take responsibility of the code and the potential bugs
86.
by diwank 1y ago
we tried a few different variations but tbh had universally bad results. for example, we use `ward` test runner in our python codebase, and claude sonnet (both 3.7 and 4) keep trying to force-switch it to pytest lol. every. single. time. ma
87.
by diwank 1y ago
true but this does matter to a lot of enterprise customers that have to obey strict data provenance laws (for instance, there are no gpt-4.1 model endpoints hosted in India and hence, fin-tech companies cannot use those apis)
88.
by diwank 1y ago
the cost per token for ~similar performance is dropping by a factor of 2 every 10-11 months at the moment, so I am not sure. that said, I think devs in less expensive parts of the world are actually picking up these tools the fastest (maybe
89.
by diwank 1y ago
absolutely! I think of these as new levers in the making, rather rusty, and def can often bite you in the behind but worth learning, and perhaps most importantly to help evolve them into useful tools rather than an excuse to ship sloppy eng
90.
by diwank 1y ago
I appreciate this :)

More ›