Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
diskcat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>and it's anonymous. no it's not.
92.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
This is damage control. You clearly want to make people update their profiles or whatever by pretending to be somebody else they know. You went with an immoral strategy to grow your business and that now it has finally hit you in the face o
93.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
You need basically every merchant to sign up for your payment app to work. Otherwise people would just use credit cards, who have been here since forever.
94.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>The entire model is predicated on not paying in each year exactly how much you take out in benefits. That would completely defeat the purpose. So, of course young people pay more than they take out, while they are young and here's
95.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>I guess my point is we all pay in, and we all ultimately take out of the system. And my point is that young people disproportionately pay in a larger value and disproportionately take out a smaller value. > You pay based on your own
96.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>The wage gains were real, and people spent a big part of those gains to get more healthcare. for old people, who are not earning those wages. blame socialism
97.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
Yeah. infinite apm would make stuff like marine being able to turn around and shoot instantly OP. it was just impossible to exploit before with human reflex. also the APM is not unlimited, it is only very high.
98.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
The title is really underwhelming compared to how cool the demo is.
99.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
okay 10 atm then
100.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
That's because he's talking to you. He's not gonna tell you he despises you to your face. But secretly he wonders: "why does he get more than me, im smarter than him!!". This is then bottled up under 10 psi of press
101.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
The post i replied to started off with "If you know the diameter of the observable Universe" but if the result it depends on the size of the observable universe then you ought to say "given the size of the observable universe
102.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
The problem is that when you share your salary people who make less than you start despising you and people who make more than you start looking down on you. It's less of a corporate conspiracy but more "this is why you can't
103.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
I think this assumes the order of magnitude of the size of the observable universe. Clearly if the diameter of the universe is smaller than a proton then you don't need 43 digits of pi to calculate its circumference to smaller than the
104.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
Let me tell you about ancient roman engineers they didn't even have wheelbarrows.
105.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
You pay for the traffic of things like TV as well. You pay for the machine that turns radio signal into video/audio and you pay the opportunity cost of the radio bandwidth which is public property that is used for transmission of TV si
106.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
What's new is that people defend enforced advertisement. Nobody is gonna complain if you close your eyes when ads pop up on your TV.
107.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
Could you believe that 2016 is the year of the beginning of the LISP renaissance. Im going to buy some spare paren keys, they might become scarce in the immediate future.
108.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
But you have to program every conceivable 'normal' situations, so really you are just using a variable definition term like 'normal' to tautologically argue.
109.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
muh founding fathers US founders would be appalled by the fact that you can't own slaves anymore too. nobody can farm 20 acres of land by himself.
110.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
You didn't reconcile it. Guns were foreign and unfamiliar to you so your fear them. Encryption is familiar to and understood by you so you are okay with it. They are just tools. They can be used or abused. You are not as rational as yo
111.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
i don't think empathy is an appropriate word for this. It is defined as the ability to share the feelings of others. While in this case, what you want the robots to know is what most people would call 'common sense'.
112.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
Maybe the 'journalists' should stop basing their revenue model on ads people don't wanna see. The internet made information easier to get, nobody wants to look at your shitty information (ads) that's baited by your only
113.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
> each election will turn into a competition on increasing that type of spending. It's basically a massive redistribution scheme this is already happening without basic income. Every subsidy, every tax, every public school, every pu
114.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>This is different from welfare systems, which only support a small number of people who actually need it. It's different from welfare in that everybody gets an equitable amount, instead of who 'needs' it getting the most.
115.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
There is a possibility that the AlphaGo team, knowing that it has already won a decisive victory, wanted to spare the champion a crushing 5-0 defeat and so commanded the AI to lose on purpose.
116.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
I think the reason you don't have uberised flight is because planes are more buses than cars
117.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
My question is why is it that this level of diligence is applied to the civil aviation industry, and not to something like cars and buses which kill way more people per distance travelled. My guess would be it's because people like to
118.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
>For an institution whose sole purpose is to engender security, they do the opposite. Well the security they engender is mostly physical security i.e. not getting blown up by terrorists while the security they want to breach is informati
119.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
If these things are so bad, why do people consume them? Is everybody else but you so stupid as to be consuming these obviously 'bad' products? Just because you think something is bad, doesn't mean it is bad. I would have no t
120.
▲
by
diskcat
11y ago
It's true that the people are responsible for the state of the government, after all if they didn't like it they could just revolt and install a new and better system... In reality when you have a country of 300M, a single voice i
More ›