Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dis-sys
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
301.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
It worth it, not for the language itself but for teaching everyone a good lesson - don't destroy the backwards compatibility when experimenting your incremental ideas.
302.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> But I don't think good engineers could "shine" with it. any concrete example on what a good engineer couldn't achieve when using Go in its intended domain/role?
303.
▲
More than 10M ofo users apply for deposit refunds
(technode.com)
3 points
by
dis-sys
8y ago
|
0 comments
304.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
if you can't wait, you can always go to tmall.com, which is operated by the exact same company, and get yourself this pink "car" delivered for $950 USD https://detail.tmall.com/item.htm?id=568970816397
305.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> Chinese car joint ventures has been ran for a decade but still Chinese can't design a decent car. such joint ventures have been there for 3 decades, vw is the first western company that started such joint ventures back in the mid
306.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
very cool article! wondering is there any comprehensive comparison of Linux/Freebsd?
307.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
I realized that a Chinese court just acknowledged the fact that Qualcomm has a portfolio of patents not relate to modems and still widely used by many very popular phones. it seems to me that this actually gives Qualcomm extra justification
308.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
not every single thread on HN has to be politicized. Qualcomm picked these patents months ago, they filed a lawsuit by arguing that these patents are being used by Apple without licensing. This is enough to call these concerned patents &quo
309.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
For Qualcomm, it seems that you get $1500 USD when your patent is filed and another $1500 USD when granted. I guess one can pocket more rewards once your patent is proven to be more valuable to the company. The question is how much and in w
310.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
Qualcomm got this win because of two patents relate to software. For their inventors, they are probably not working on Qualcomm's core business (licensing and modem), wondering what will happen to them? An email from their superiors sa
311.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
check those links provided in my reply. Intel has already committed such fraud multiple times. let's don't forget that its ex-CEO sold all his shares before the Meltdown and Spectre went public, yet he managed to walk away free of
312.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
People need to be very careful about Intel's definition of "on track". A couple examples below - In 2016, Intel confirmed that "10nm chips still on track for 2017" https://www.fool.com/investing/
313.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
it usually works the other way around - they give you a 2-3% discount when paying with your mobile. in that sense, an extra fee for accepting physical cash is already there.
314.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
that is the _exact_ phase used by the author of the post I am replying to. please read before posting.
315.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
they have 95% of the market share. other minor players are not accepted by most businesses.
316.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> everyone in China appears to pay by mobile phone without problems using WeChat Pay and Alipay and no one seems to be locked out. That is not true. I met people who don't have Alipay/WeChat on weekly basis. China's centra
317.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> What about future firmware upgrade or hardware replacement that isn’t vetted today. same question for all Cisco/IBM/HP/Apple devices used in countries not that close to the US/UK. should they use the same cheap excu
318.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> The access the manufacturer has is a different level totally agreed, that is exactly how NSA works with Cisco. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
319.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> Who are the many? are you assuming that there are not many hardliners in China? > One side says the equipment isn’t secure after so many years with so many Huawei equipments used in the west, when all kinds of security experts and l
320.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
Many are asking the same legitimate question - what is the point keeping the free trade agreement with NZ when Chinese products are being treated like that.
321.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
are you suggesting that Chinese should ban all UK high tech stuff in China until it can be proven to be backdoor free? sounds like a fair reaction to me.
322.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
I just saw news that millions of mobile users in UK and Japan got kicked off the net by those high quality carrier-grade Ericsson carrier equipments. https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/6/18128720/o2-down-so
323.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> There is no denying their products are not only of poor quality (competing on price) Huawei Mate 20 Pro starts from 1049 Euro and Mate 20 start from 800 Euro, last time when I checked, 1049 Euro is almost $1200 USD, common sense tells
324.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> Chinese companies enjoy open access to Western markets please show me how Huawei enjoyed its open access to the US market. if you like, I can easily show you tons of evidence on how Huawei's competitors say Cisco enjoyed its open
325.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
> The nice thing about the American system is that while treaties are difficult to pass, they are more or less permanent. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was signed in 1987, it is now dead. so by your definition, 30 years is
326.
▲
Western Digital to Open-Source the “SweRV” RISC-V Core in 2019
(phoronix.com)
2 points
by
dis-sys
8y ago
|
0 comments
327.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
Individuals are required to declare annual income on their own once they earn anything above 120K CNY (~15K USD).
328.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
I bought a German made car last year, its drive away price is about $60k USD in the US, I paid $120k for that in Shanghai - 25% tariff, 17% VAT, 25% sales tax, 10% vehicle tax, that is 77% combined. Trump choose to focus on the 25% tariff p
329.
▲
Benchmarking Amazon's ARM Graviton CPU with EC2's A1 Instances
(phoronix.com)
5 points
by
dis-sys
8y ago
|
0 comments
330.
▲
by
dis-sys
8y ago
thanks for the detailed info. phoronix.com just published some Power9 vs. Xeon vs Epyc benchmarks[1]. It is actually not on par with Xeon/Epyc. also note that the motherboard used by those Power9 has a price tag of $2499, when a dual s
More ›