dirtyid

271 ms·

2311.
by dirtyid 8y ago
Yes the obvious concern is potential risk. But the PR spin is angry Americans (and allies) screaming China bad with no (public) evidence of back doors and a preponderance of public reports from governments and private security researchers t
2312.
by dirtyid 8y ago
Australia was firm ban before US push due to past strains with China. US is obviously going to ban. UK (Along with Germany and Italy) said Huawei concerns could be managed a couple weeks ago within 24 hours of each other. Shortly after that
2313.
by dirtyid 8y ago
IMO Huawei's just seeking to rehabilitate their image, if the US refuses to publicly release evidence that contradicts the preponderance of sources that couldn't find back doors, then the entire US campaign against Huawei can be d
2314.
by dirtyid 8y ago
Detecting speech and music is particularly intriguing for different variable playback speed for speech bits and 1x for music bits.
2315.
by dirtyid 8y ago
I'm having trouble finding any addition information on this WAPY / WABY chip and was wondering if anyone has any insight. The full video can be found here for those interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvhF
2316.
James Mulvenon Discusses the Chinese Wireless Security Chip in Apple iPhones(youtube.com)
3 points by dirtyid 8y ago|2 comments
2317.
by dirtyid 10y ago
Censorship tools are not going to convince Chinese government to allow NSA influenced social media platform to compete with state controlled social media platforms. This will eventually be used domestically. Facebook and Google dropped the