dimitropoulos

11 ms·

91.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
also see: https://twitter.com/fox0x01/status/1696216492440703435
92.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
Josh Goldberg (typescript-eslint maintainer, TypeScript educator) came to Michigan to do a response to a previous talk (which was titled "TypeScript Enums are TERRIBLE").
93.
Enums are MISUNDERSTOOD (not terrible) [video](youtube.com)
2 points by dimitropoulos 3y ago|1 comments
94.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
is there any reason to suspect this isn't just a bug? Honest question: I don't know the company
95.
Grafana's schema-driven data language: Cuetsy and Thema [video](youtube.com)
3 points by dimitropoulos 3y ago|0 comments
96.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
minimum TypeScript version is 5, eh? Seems strange since there's no reason listed and TypeScript doesn't do semver but power to 'em I guess for pushing people to stay up-to-date. :)
97.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
I don't have a question per se but this post was the first time I've heard about your company and I find it to be a really interesting offering and I've told a few people about it. Having done a small amount of portrait phot
98.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
why only TypeScript? I realize you can't please everyone at all times but I'd love to have a Rust or Zig SDK option. Go is a good start in that direction I guess..
99.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
I'd love to see something similar for other similar things (e.g. performance.now)
100.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
what happened is they took the recording of him saying "2004" at the 00:47 mark and spliced that audio over the 00:07 mark. strange, but if you listen to the 00:47 and then back to the 00:07 it's quite clear it's the sa
101.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
I'd love to hear more about the tool that they're using to transform protobuf for type hinting in the editor. Is that open source somewhere?
102.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
> Linked Cursors for JSX Tags I am so excited to see a release with so many quality-of-life features like this one ("Avoiding Unnecessary Type Instantiation" is also super great). Toss in negated types (and pipelines, when they
103.
TypeScript 5.1(devblogs.microsoft.com)
8 points by dimitropoulos 3y ago|1 comments
104.
Are the types wrong? Tool for analyzing TypeScript types of NPM packages(arethetypeswrong.github.io)
2 points by dimitropoulos 3y ago|0 comments
105.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
This showcase looks at arethetypeswring.github.io, a project that attempts to analyze npm package contents for issues with their TypeScript types, particularly ESM-related module resolution issues.
106.
by dimitropoulos 3y ago
If anyone is interested in type-level programming, I've been doing quite a lot of that on the Michigan TypeScript YouTube channel -> one video every day since January. We also have had some really great guests on the show, one of wh
107.
Please fix your spinner(pleasefixyourspinner.com)
52 points by dimitropoulos 3y ago|50 comments
108.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
I may or may not have immediately googled the age of Uwe Rosenberg (he's only 53). Too bad about Klaus. 70 is too young. Hard not to wonder if "short and sudden illness" means COVID, but, of course, his family deserves priv
109.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
If anyone is interested in knowing more about module resolution in TypeScript, a friend of mine did a great talk about it [0]. It touches on exactly this topic in the timestamp in the link. [0]: https://youtu.be/MEl2R7mEAP8?
110.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
I encourage anyone who disagrees with this to give Nest.js a try (note: not Next.js)
111.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
yes exactly. The only other context I'll add is for people shipping Flow that I knew at the time they felt that this announcement felt like it came about two years too late. I had already switched to TypeScript long before because, in
112.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
I have to disclose my potential bias here because I am these days very involved in the TypeScript world (with Michigan TypeScript). That said, I would never hide the fact that I was once a die-hard Flow person that.. died hard, haha. (and
113.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
that's a false equivocation in the sense that you just moved the goalposts by defining what "runtime" means. There are no types whatsoever as far as processors are concerned. No types in assembly Not for Go or Java, not for
114.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
100%! I have a package that I've been running on nightly just to get this. Felt a bit like the wait for a const generics in Rust (except here, it didn't take long at all)!
115.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
Even if that's true (it's definitely not how it was depicted at the time at conferences and from people on the Google side).. the point stands Angular was absolutely huge for it's day and they pushed TypeScript really really
116.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
yes! haha. They love it. I ping them and see if they want to identify themselves.
117.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
And it doesn't hurt that the TypeScript team is so great. We've seen some public apologies from the Flow team on this topic so I don't feel like I'm talking behind anyone's back if I say they ended up truly not bei
118.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
Agreed, but the point I was making here is that Angular itself was very far from stillborn, it pushed early adoption of TypeScript really really hard which did wonders for TypeScript to be taken seriously.
119.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
it's going to be really hard for me to find now after all these years but there's a video somewhere on YouTube of someone at a conference showing their first attempts at getting TypeScript to work with JSX involving lots of specia
120.
by dimitropoulos 4y ago
> Flow tries to be as sound and complete as possible. > https://flow.org/en/docs/lang/types-and-expressions/ That's what I was talking about re: Flow. That's a really insightful comment y

More ›