Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dimino
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
It only adds the burden to DevOps who can't figure out how to monitor/maintain a system, which is not rocket science, and if you're a DevOps person who doesn't know how to handle such a mainstream technology as, say, Zer
32.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
> If one person’s presence is derailing the conversation for some reason, don’t automatically decide they must be the bad guy. The absolute worst thing you can do is to tell that person to shut up and leave the discussion while allowing
33.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Sorry, but what you call a "toy", I call a highly reliable technology that's used in production widely across the majority of Fortune 500 companies. No one here is suggesting anything remotely like what you're strawmann
34.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
I'm not missing the point, I'm discounting the point, because the point that adding technology is additional complexity, and complexity is bad is a nonsense argument that actually stems from a fear of new things. This has nothin
35.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
No, I'm assuming you haven't otherwise you'd know that redis AND postgres are inferior message brokers, both of them, and the fact that you haven't corrected me means you're not well versed at all in this problem do
36.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
It is very much a bad technology sourcing strategy, and you will kill your business if you attempt it. Period. It comes from a place of ignorance, and you're promoting ignorance. Learn why technologies exist and make an informed
37.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Sorry, but this isn't one of those cases. A RDBMS is objectively inferior for queueing compared to dedicated message broker technologies. This is blatantly obvious if you've ever used both for queueing. You're applying gene
38.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
I trust 1Password 100x more than I trust any individual to keep password information safe.
39.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
I find this argument to be pretty weak, and seems to be a stand-in for, "I don't want to use a new technology because it'd require me to learn something, so I'm going to shoehorn something I feel more comfortable with, e
40.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
rq is pretty good, have you checked it out?
41.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
And I suppose adding, "...while keeping you informed about what's happening in the world" or "...while entertaining you" wouldn't matter to you, would it?
42.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
What's trolly is to derail a conversation, repeatedly trying to get on your soapbox to parrot word association rants about a company that you agree did nothing wrong in this specific situation.
43.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
That's because you're ignoring the actual article and the discussion around the article and going on a tangential rant. You're basically "feeling comfortable" derailing a conversation to talk about what you want to
44.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Again, you went wide. Specifically, Walmart is not responsible for Dean's bankruptcy, which was all we were discussing.
45.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Yes, those are the facts, but why is that a problem? Why is Dean the responsibility of Walmart?
46.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
How does the power you have over people who are otherwise identical to you play into it?
47.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
So you also want the media industry to die as well? Too bad, but most of us don't.
48.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Sometimes, but mostly not.
49.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Yes, but try to stay specific to this situation. How is Walmart obligated to buy milk from one specific supplier forever? You seem to want to go wide with this, but the question isn't a generic one; it's very particular to Walmar
50.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Informative? Seems like you want to mitigate my theoretical dissent, to be honest...
51.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Wait why is Walmart a bad guy here? Walmart isn't obligated to keep these folks in business, relying on one customer is risky.
52.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Walmart wasn't the first company to do this, many of the big grocers are in housing milk production, or so I heard from someone who works at Walmart HQ.
53.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
People will flag a comment they don't like, hop on multiple accounts to spam downvotes, will downvote everything a person writes (via their comment history), all kinds of malicious behavior on HN if someone posts something they disagre
54.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
I promise I did look! Thanks, though.
55.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
When you bind the pages this doesn't work anymore, since you can't reorder the read page to the back. Did I miss the author addressing this, or is it one of the disadvantages not listed?
56.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
Could not disagree more; the community is an echo chamber because of how poorly dang treats dissent, and more importantly how easy it is to silence alternative viewpoints here. As a result, growth doesn't happen here, only self validat
57.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
You shouldn't be in that position. You are a user, Reddit shouldn't out you in a position to have to do their job for them. At the very least, you should get a cut of the ad revenue your sub brings in. No technical reason they c
58.
▲
by
dimino
7y ago
This is great news, very excited to see the fruits of this labor. Skip to here for a bit more info: https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/988#issuecomment-55267449... An explanation of the problem and the soluti
59.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
The onus is on me to figure out what you would need to believe this was Russia?
60.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
The point is the article cherry-picks a single point of data and claims it's the only point of data, when in reality the whole sum of the IOC is what identifies Russia, not any specific piece of malware.
More ›