dilyevsky

4 ms·

31.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Well it's SPoF for a shard not the whole thing so in practice that makes this considerably better. Secondly, it's not a datapath SPoF so presumably all tailscaled processes would continue running and exchanging traffic no problem
32.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
With opus 4.7-ish to fable 5, immediately after release - before they locked it down, it was shockingly easy to find crash bugs in a lot of very heavily used DBs and other software.
33.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Because then you’d have to pay taxes
34.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Agree on the equity, afaik it’s due to how eager European countries are to tax illiquid shares on exercise instead of on sale like in US. Even without the equity part i think most engineers should be thankful for not having to hit their kpi
35.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
First of all it's not just SV - all of US sales is like this. Second, if you're talking about Europe - base/variable comps split may not be 50/50 but it's often the same OTE structure with some modifications due to
36.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
if i'm working for a company i sure hope they're sending their sales reps to a tropical paradise, and if they don't, i hope i don't own any equity.
37.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Clearly ai written comment
38.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
That was exactly my process on this article and the rest. Often i actually scrap claude/chatgpt edit because it sounds so fake and rewrite it myself. And like i said elsewhere - diagrams are pure ai because i don’t personally care for
39.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
the soak tub in the kitchen was nice
40.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
I actually do get public cloud as well as running your own racks. There is room for both. Your startup is growing 100% every quarter but you're not sure if you have real PMF yet? Yeah probably stick with cloud. Zombiecorn growing 10-20
41.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
This is a company blog. I run some paragraphs through ai to fix my dogshit sentence structure since english is not my first language (come to think of it, my russian has always been pretty lame too). Get over it
42.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Did anyone really expect OCI deal not to become, shall we say, less generous as they slowly creep up their market share? Anyone banking on OCI being cheaper provider is playing a game of musical chairs.
43.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
Im not entirely sure what the motivation was for replacing nghttp2 with oghttp2 - nghttp2 is probably the most used codec for http/2 - so probably not compliance. I think it was mostly about code reuse since oghttp2 is part of QUICHE w
44.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
I did write it, the machine did all the react tho (with my help)
45.
Google's HTTP/2 codec slows Envoy(apoxy.dev)
47 points by dilyevsky 2mo ago|10 comments
46.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
the capex vs opex arugment would be persuasive if you couldn't lease servers. and obviously colo was always opex. basically the only time you'd get into serious capex was when you were building your own datacenters
47.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
> Its addresses are MAC addresses, serial numbers burned into each card at the factory. oof Nice idea, but execution could be better - way too many factual errors. Actually, considering it appears to be just 100% ai slop it's a lit
48.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
I met a number of really successful founders who came in just wanting to build a business and found a niche later (sometimes waaay later). I suspect majority of founders with “great ideas” discovered them after the company was started and
49.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
yes it's true, us court has ruled destructive scanning is required to make it "fair use" (ianal, etc etc) - https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/06/from-bo...
50.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
author here, thanks! i tried putting both on the same plot in FIG 1 but it was kind of a mess... https://apoxy.dev/blog/netstack-bbrv3#behind-the-scenes has more of the thought process and choice of tools.
51.
by dilyevsky 2mo ago
The posters interpretation of why Envoy is using downstream on listener side and upstream on backend side is wrong. There's a formal definition in RFC 2616: upstream/downstream Upstream and downstream describe the flow of
52.
Simulating TCP loss and congestion in browser using Go/WASM(ccsim.fly.dev)
71 points by dilyevsky 2mo ago|3 comments
53.
by dilyevsky 3mo ago
> security companies are going to comb over the weights and discover every hidden secret of the model is this even doable? it seems plausible the model can be order-66'ed without it being so obvious
54.
by dilyevsky 3mo ago
A lot of software projects don't make money directly. Our company makes money. This would have cost thousands of dollars paid to a contractor previously with unclear results so yes it's 100% justified. You're citing a paper t
55.
by dilyevsky 3mo ago
Here is a TCP simulator I built using Fable 5 to reproduce BBR paper results: https://ccsim.apoxy.dev It took it ~4 hours to bang out initial version which was slightly broken then it took me another day to fix some bugs. A year
56.
by dilyevsky 3mo ago
"do not fool yourself" proceeds to fool himself... if you are honest about your bias that's still fooling yourself if your conclusions are just demonstrably wrong.
57.
Our Blog Post Runs a TCP Stack(apoxy.dev)
1 points by dilyevsky 3mo ago|0 comments
58.
Show HN: BBRv3 for gVisor's netstack, visualized in the browser using WASM(ccsim.apoxy.dev)
3 points by dilyevsky 3mo ago|0 comments
59.
by dilyevsky 3mo ago
If you try actually filling out DS-160 and going through the rest of the process the difference will become really clear.
60.
Where gVisor cold-boot time goes – and why a bigger instance won't fix it(apoxy.dev)
2 points by dilyevsky 3mo ago|0 comments

More ›