digging

11 ms·

121.
by digging 2y ago
I'm super appreciative of what we have, but there's absolutely issues. CAN-SPAM specifies that the link must be clearly marked and suggests using CSS to do so, but the link is still always going to be at the bottom of the email in
122.
by digging 2y ago
Honestly, using a username generator in Bitwarden, it's so easy to do this that it basically "pays" for itself the first time you get a "true" spam email and it's effortless to identify who sold you out. I orig
123.
by digging 2y ago
I generate a "username" on Bitwarden for every new address I need which is effectively the same approach (using my domain). Do you mean though that you generate an email address with your mail server, or do you just use a catch-al
124.
by digging 2y ago
> I don't know why anyone cares. Not because of what you're thinking. What's concerning is how easy it is to bypass leading AI companies' best attempts at restricting output. It bodes poorly for future AI if we can&#x
125.
by digging 2y ago
> Your last sentence would have been a fine reply to the GP without any meta level commenting. I get that but I stand by all of it though. > data from the experts monitoring the reef did not line up with the climate change predictions
126.
by digging 2y ago
Information is fine, overconfident denialist commentary earns a downvote. When you see a comment to the effect of "The self-proclaimed experts are wrong! I know the truth," you should heavily discount the conclusions it draws. J
127.
by digging 2y ago
> Seriously. Thanks for confirming OP's point What was implied in my previous comment is that someone who doesn't know anything about digital privacy and security can't be called lazy for not investing in it. And lots of p
128.
by digging 2y ago
Terrible take. Our modern world is hopelessly complicated and we don't ask every citizen to personally defend their physical security from outside threats, nor personally manage their water and food security. How do you even square the
129.
by digging 2y ago
Look, the word "better" has no meaning here. This thread is pointless unless those involved are discussing specifics and acknowledging personal preferences. Anyway, Bloodborne is a PS4 exclusive masterpiece and it would be absur
130.
by digging 2y ago
I feel this new version could help with that if unapproved users are restricted in the types of issues they're allowed to create. Something like "external". Or vice versa, they can't create "Internal" issues.
131.
by digging 2y ago
You wouldn't get spammed.
132.
by digging 2y ago
Is this abuse? Were people taking these boxes as soon as they were delivered, or were people taking home boxes of leftovers? I don't think I've ever been to an event of any sort which had ordered pizzas and saw someone just take a
133.
by digging 2y ago
> pursuing the right choice I don't agree with this framing. A person's opinion of what a "good" or "right" outcome is is one of the inputs to the algorithm . When you decide to put in less effort it's
134.
by digging 2y ago
Chatbot is the form factor; LLMs are what is being called AI. SmarterChild wasn't an LLM.
135.
by digging 2y ago
They very clearly did break something because a lot of people got upset and said they broke something, and then they admitted they broke something.
136.
by digging 2y ago
Then you should define what it means to you. I've given enough in my other reply.
137.
by digging 2y ago
#2 is obviously false - and #1 is obviously true, to me. Whether or not you wrote this comment was a decision you made. The only way "free will" is even an open question is if you can't decide what "you" are. If you
138.
by digging 2y ago
> thus it's presence must mean life if there Nobody said that. It's on you for making the leap, whether out of hope or misguided combativeness, to the assertion that it must mean life , which I don't recall ever being sta
139.
by digging 2y ago
Once again, you've converted "this supports [alternate theory]" into "it must be [alternate theory]." At least address the argument being made instead of a strawman.
140.
by digging 2y ago
From my perspective, > This hype around AI is gaudy. Nearly every implementation feels cheap, half-baked, and obnoxious. is true but does not imply: > AI is completely useless in almost every way I see it implemented which is not true
141.
by digging 2y ago
A huge number of people are 60lbs or more overweight and are still very agile, too. It's silly to keep picking this fight this way.
142.
by digging 2y ago
> How is that not going to make you less agile (no matter how well made)? Because the weight is distributed and carefully balanced and the parts are fitted to the wearer's body. It does in fact matter how it's made, it's n
143.
by digging 2y ago
Fun calculator. A little noisy to make its points, but "You could die right now and Shell could continue operating for 6 seconds longer with the carbon you saved" is a powerful statement. I wasted so much energy in my most vig
144.
by digging 2y ago
> But a knight in full plate with a longsword is certainly much less agile than someone with a rapier and no armour. No, that's not really true either.
145.
by digging 2y ago
On reflection I think you've convinced me, and I find it curious that I initially dismissed the parallels with other vices. I think I felt disconnected from, and maybe above, gambling, so I had less sympathy for it happening in illegal
146.
by digging 2y ago
Good point, although I wasn't the first to complain on this submission so I don't think I contributed to your count.
147.
by digging 2y ago
You are arguing that reversing the very recent legalization of sports gambling would be a net harm to society and that there would be greater suffering than there is today because of that ban. Are you making that argument by accident, becau
148.
by digging 2y ago
Sure, there are many other forms of advertising that are irresponsible in the public sphere. > It seems like the question is always about the degree to which the governments ought to intervene to protect us from each other...and ourselve
149.
by digging 2y ago
But this title is clickbait. It's a lie . It could have been "How real spies were nothing like movie spies."
150.
by digging 2y ago
I'm quite peeved because this article contained almost no new information for me. This is the basic stuff you learn about spies if you have literally any interest in historical spying, plus some trivia about how to make invisible ink

More ›