diggan

50 ms·

691.
by diggan 1y ago
> Seems more like custom onlyfans, live chats, phone sex, etc. It seems it needs to be interactive I thought so at first too! But no, audio and text is excluded it seems, and only custom photos and custom videos are included in the law.
692.
by diggan 1y ago
Technically, if you move to Netherlands, that becomes your new home, so you'd be OK with paying taxes there too then :)
693.
by diggan 1y ago
> where they are distanced from their buyers, even anonymized, is taken away from them. The platform where THEY dictated how far they'd want to go. Yeah, this is what I don't quite understand. I've read https://
694.
by diggan 1y ago
No, "normal" porn is still legal, what is becoming illegal is "influencing" the produced content in any way, as the government sees that as being equal to paying someone to perform a sexual act, something which is illega
695.
by diggan 1y ago
Unless the browser is configured otherwise, there is a referrer ("referer" to be precise) header that the server receives when you go to a page from a link. This is how it could look from the webmaster's point of view: https
696.
by diggan 1y ago
Original submission title, which I think better captures the actual change that has happened: "Buying custom adult content became illegal in Sweden first of July 2025". It seems moderators may have gotten a bit too eager with impr
697.
A new law in Sweden makes it illegal to buy custom adult content(euronews.com)
86 points by diggan 1y ago|105 comments
698.
by diggan 1y ago
Obviously subjective, but I had seen The Martian before I read the book (many years after seeing the movie), and liked the book way better than the movie. Read Project Hail Mary right after finishing The Martian, and enjoyed that one even m
699.
by diggan 1y ago
> I'd love to see how they even define AGI crisply enough for a contract. Seems to be about this: > As per the current terms, when OpenAI creates AGI - defined as a "highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most e
700.
by diggan 1y ago
> edit: Also, I'm now confused about the ESA's claim to be the "first", because I think you might have misread the title, "Europe’s first [...]" > Is there a more technical article describing this hypersp
701.
Happy Birthday, GamingOnLinux – 16 years today(gamingonlinux.com)
82 points by diggan 1y ago|8 comments
702.
by diggan 1y ago
It isn't super popular, no. I think the requirements are pretty strict if I remember correctly (edit: https://www.iana.org/domains/int/policy ). I think esa.int is probably one of the more popular .int domains
703.
Europe's first geostationary sounder satellite is launched(eumetsat.int)
223 points by diggan 1y ago|50 comments
704.
by diggan 1y ago
> Well given that you basically can't spend bitcoin anywhere Grand statement coming from someone who hasn't been everywhere .
705.
by diggan 1y ago
> That seems a hell of a lot more centralized than the traditional finance system Most countries/systems have one central bank, even if we assume there are only 2 mining pools and they "control the network", wouldn't
706.
by diggan 1y ago
> Bitcoin is still a criminal ecosystem in 2025 Welcome to reality, where good/neutral things sometimes are used for bad :) Name one financial system that doesn't have any elements of criminality involved in them. > Its only
707.
by diggan 1y ago
> As long as there is no world use Who judges this? Is "bubble" a personal/subjective thing then? Bitcoin is a bubble for you, because there is no use case, but not a bubble for others that can use it for any reason?
708.
by diggan 1y ago
> What you're saying is that the claim "it's a bubble" is not falsifiable (people move price and time targets) and therefore a belief and not scientifically grounded, just like a religion. No, I'm merely trying t
709.
by diggan 1y ago
> The house of cards would collapse very quickly if one whale cashed out So a thing is a "bubble" for as long as it is possible for it to collapse if whales cash out too quickly? In your mind, every financial system today is a
710.
by diggan 1y ago
All of them are less than 12 months old, and most of the results on the first search page been at one point on the frontpage. Another search, limiting it to >50 points (so passed through the frontpage at one point) and within the last 12
711.
by diggan 1y ago
For how long does a "bubble" need to be in "the bubble" for it to not be considered a "bubble" anymore? I'm guessing there is a time limit involved here somewhere?
712.
by diggan 1y ago
> This bubble has spurred zero posts as far as I can tell, or zero that gained any traction. ... Did you look? Quick search turns up a bunch of stories that were on the frontpage: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYea
713.
by diggan 1y ago
Honestly, no. When people seek for forums to connect with other humans, LLMs aren't a good alternative for that. And I say that as someone who generally find LLMs useful, I'm not a "AI is impeding doom" person, but their
714.
by diggan 1y ago
The world of "spicy reading" isn't new to me (male), just that website in particular. I don't think it's as gendered as you paint it, but I'd also acknowledge it depends a lot on geographic location, probably l
715.
by diggan 1y ago
> it's interesting that some people are on the internet but is very well insulated Not sure I'd call it "insulated", the internet is just very, very vast, even when considering "just" the English-speaking we
716.
by diggan 1y ago
> Because they won't be fine for much longer under their socialist government How long would a state required to be socialist before you consider it to not be in a perpetual state of "this will fail tomorrow"? Since you co
717.
by diggan 1y ago
> I’m sorry, but in anything you wrote there, I can’t see an argument against anything I wrote. I guess the "for free" part kind of threw off the rest of the comment, that's on me. > But users do expect updates to be a
718.
by diggan 1y ago
If anything, wouldn't it be the opposite? When you offload something to a human, at least you can say "it was their fault!" and point to an actual name, or similar. But you can't use a tool and then say "it was the
719.
by diggan 1y ago
> The point is writing that prompt takes longer than writing the code. Luckily we can reuse system prompts :) Mine usually contains something like https://gist.github.com/victorb/1fe62fe7b80a64fc5b446f82d313... + pr
720.
by diggan 1y ago
No, is that common where you're from?

More ›