Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
diehunde
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
211.
▲
Deep-Ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (Dart)
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
diehunde
6y ago
|
0 comments
212.
▲
Ask HN: How much time do you spend studying outside working hours?
14 points
by
diehunde
6y ago
|
5 comments
213.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Depends on the project. People like to say "consultant" but most of the are just staff augmentation and many of them do work that won't absorbe a lot of knowledge.
214.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
That's why companies end up requiring "extensions" over and over for consultants. I know people working for consultant firms that have been with the same client for more than 3 years.
215.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I wonder what the consequences can be for doing this. Just pay full price or also face legal actions.
216.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Awesome resource to improve your Go skills at the same time since all assignments are in Go.
217.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I'm currently reading Distributed Systems by Tanenbaum [1]. It goes into more detail and it's more extensive. It's more outdated but the fundamentals are there. [1] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1
218.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
It depends on how good you are at solving coding puzzles. Checkout LeetCode. Many people post their experiences interviewing for companies there. My guess is the problems are hard so it would require months of training solving coding proble
219.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Let's check some of his projects to see if we can give some feedback.
220.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I've seen most real-world applications that use in-memory search, use balanced binary search trees. Are any of these improvements applicable to those data structures? AVL and Red-black trees come to mind.
221.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
GoLand seems to be lighter than IntelliJ though. I'll try using the plugins to see if the experience is different. Maybe I'm paying too much for the whole suite.
222.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
> Yes please, if we could have more software engineers working on mechanical/aeronautical/civil/<physical> engineering tools that would be great. That was my favorite subject in college and I wanted to pursue that ar
223.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I've heard that before but I'm skeptic about if it's exactly the same.
224.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Some I can think of: - Automata theory - Complexity theory (P vs NP stuff, not the one from leetcode problems) - Verification - Optimization using stuff like genetic algorithms, ant-colony algorithms, particle swarm, simulated annealing, et
225.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I went through the Netflix process and even though it was lengthy it was pretty good IMO. No crazy questions and a good balance between technical and behavioral questions. I'm aware it varies a lot between teams but it looks like they
226.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I don't know if it counts as enterprise software but I use Jetbrains' products everyday. Goland, IntelliJ and PyCharm are great tools.
227.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
> I think the move to "chemical" explanations is largely because the "chemical" treatments have been wildly successful This. The fact that "the mechanism of action remains a mystery" doesn't mean we sh
228.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
The problem is we don't like the process, but not many people propose reasonable solutions. One extreme is just hard LeetCode questions, and the other is, "they should just talk to me about my experience and projects." We nee
229.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
That's what I read here. People got upset because he said Kubernetes was bad software and gRPC was a bad choice.
230.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Sorry but even though I disagree with most of the points from the article, I prefer to read this instead of a shy and unconfident rant from someone that's afraid of insulting your favorite tech.
231.
▲
Ask HN: Recommend a short fiction book
2 points
by
diehunde
6y ago
|
5 comments
232.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I can't imagine a constraint that would lead to restrict the use of Linux over Windows/MacOs unless is bureaucracy or ignorance like OP said. The only exceptions I can think of is they do development with tools only available for
233.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I don't think it's old. I actually think OP is a bit young to be a principal engineer assuming that's what comes after senior.
234.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
That's why you need to adapt your CV accordingly. You change things depending if it's a startup or a big company. Also depending on the role.
235.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
That would be true if by cooking you mean boiling some pasta for 10 minutes or eating some scrabble eggs. That's hardly cooking.
236.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
Fair enough. So assuming you need a house to survive, do you need to know how to build one? If your toilet breaks, do you know how to fix it? Again, some people would argue that calling "the guy" is always shortsighted and wastefu
237.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I disagree. Some people cut their own hair or build their own furniture and would say everyone needs to know how to do that stuff instead of depending on and paying someone else. There's a reason cooking is also a profession, and there
238.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
For a big project GoLand is the way to go. For small or quick edits I like to use vim with the vim-go plugin[1]. [1] https://github.com/fatih/vim-go
239.
▲
Exciting Days for ARM Processors
(smist08.wordpress.com)
145 points
by
diehunde
6y ago
|
182 comments
240.
▲
by
diehunde
6y ago
I was reading the Github thread, and I was surprised people who were against it didn't mention any technical problem that may arise from these changes but only opinions about why it's OK to keep them. That alone shows me the disco
More ›