diegoholiveira

8 ms·

31.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> What i said is that Elon expect that a right wing government would block, difficult or delay this single Chinese company from buying Sigma Lithium to help him to buy it instead.. My point is about this: Musk's expectations will mo
32.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
nah, Bolsonaro criticizing China is the same as Lula criticizing the US: they are sending signals to their supporters. Both know that Brazil is not in a position to refuse to do business with China and the US.
33.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> Musk expect that a right wing government will align with him, and be in favor of blocking China and that would open the door for him to buy the mining companies instead.. Things in Brazil are not simple as that. Bolsonaro, the latest r
34.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
The process that makes X be blocked here in Brazil started in 2019, way before Jan 6th.
35.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Australians already own those lithium mines. The largest here in Brazil is very close to my hometown.
36.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> Is X a bralizian institution ? I don't think so... so X has no right to oppose this decision ! They have the right because you can appeal to the court. The problem is: it’s the Supreme Court, your appeal would be judged by the sam
37.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Starlink is offering free service to current customers until they can access their bank accounts again.
38.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> Just how important are the ground stations in Brazil? Is used by the military, hospitals and schools on remote places on the amazon rainforest.
39.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
diego_moita does not care about an argument. I show him an argument from the retired minister of the Supreme Court and he says: “this is old news”, ignoring that the current process is the same since 2019. My opinion: he agree with the deci
40.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
It’s the same secret process. It’s being around since 2019.
41.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
https://noticias.r7.com/brasil/e-um-inquerito-do-fim-do-mund... That’s a retired minister of the Brazilian Supreme Court. With a quick search you can find many others experts saying the same.
42.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
No lawyer haves access to the documents because it’s a secret investigation.
43.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Again, did India sent an illegal order to X like the Brazilian Supreme Court? Since 2019 the STF is conducting an illegal investigation in secret. I bet that India did nothing like this.
44.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Did India sent him an illegal order?
45.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
It’s about time. F1 will be huge on US in the near future.
46.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
The law that regulates internet on Brazil (marco civil da internet), does not require a platform to have a legal representation here.
47.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
I don't know about India, but in Brazil, the requests sent to X (Twitter) have no legal basis, that is, they are illegal by nature. The entire process that resulted in this blocking is secret and not even the defense lawyers had access
48.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> Moraes' order claimed they were part of an "economic group" due to Musk's ownership. The problem is that this is not true, the two companies are not part of the same economic group. They are two completely different
49.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> In what way? Musk decides what's OK and not OK on twitter. Before Musk, others were doing the same, but on the other side of the political spectrum from where Musk is now. Nothing new.
50.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Is it?
51.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
If a court orders you to shoot someone in the head, would you do it?
52.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
I don't know about India, but in Brazil, the requests sent to X (Twitter) have no legal basis, that is, they are illegal by nature. The entire process that resulted in this blocking is secret and not even the defense lawyers had access
53.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
It's not common at all. Musk is shareholder of Starlink, but there are many others. This is kind of thing is only used in cause of fraud like a person who puts other company in name of a third party to avoid fines. It also shows foreig
54.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
There are an absurd amount of illegalities in this decision. The Brazilian constitution and the "marco civil da internet" (a law that regulates internet) have been torn up. It is sad to see a democracy taking this path, and still
55.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
There are an absurd amount of illegalities in this decision. The Brazilian constitution and the "marco civil da internet" (a law that regulates internet) have been torn up. It is sad to see a democracy taking this path, and still
56.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
There are an absurd amount of illegalities in this decision. The Brazilian constitution and the "marco civil da internet" (a law that regulates internet) have been torn up. It is sad to see a democracy taking this path, and still
57.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
Brazil's supreme court also ordered the blocking of all bank accounts of Starlink, a company with no direct relationship with X (Twitter). https://www.poder360.com.br/poder-justica/moraes-bloqueia-co...
58.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> From what I gather they used Article 43 from the court proceedings, that's the debatable part but they can act under that, no? Kind of. The article 43 from the court proceedings, is clear when it says that it limits the power of i
59.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
> As far as I know this is disputed and not black-and-white, there's been a back and forth between PGR, AGU and the court on the legality of the Supreme Court on investigating activities that directly affect members of the court (in
60.
by diegoholiveira 2y ago
- STF started a secret investigation about fake news, which is illegal because it’s not written on our constitution and make it the police and the punisher. - people under investigation or jailed can’t access this secret investigation, even

More ›