diegocg

28 ms·

1. 301.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   The definition of freedom in catholic countries is that men are free to choose between good and evil, but precisely because they are able to make a choice, they often choose evil, so true freedom can only be achieved repressing evil. It's h
2. 302.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   That "libertarianesque" definicion of freedom commonly used in America is not shared or understood by many countries (not that it matters to americans, of course)
3. 303.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   > Because software being written that has systemd as a dependency will be Linux only software. And this is news, and suddenly it's systemd's fault? If you hate Linux-only software, software that depends on systemd is the last of your pr
4. 304.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   >Given the title, I'll allow that most of these points are defensive and brusque Not really...
5. 305.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   I disagree, I think that Lennart is right. Nobody really cares if systemd is not portable. Upstart was not portable to BSDs, and nobody cared. The traditional sysvinit system was, AFAIK, not portable until the debian/freebsd people bothered
6. 306.▲
   by diegocg 14y ago

   In this case, Btrfs has not invented anything new. Hashed directories are a standard technique used in all modern filesystems, including Ext3/4 or XFS. It would be interesting if someone tried to get hash collisions in them with modern hard