diegocerdan

7 ms·

31.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
At Proof-of-Stake the "Proof-of-Work" is the value lost by stacking up tokens and not having them being productive otherwise. This value could be around 4% per year, same as having them on a safe invest. The good thing is that you
32.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
Ethereum is moving to PoS because it would greatly help with scaling. Once Ethereum has Casper, they can start thinking about implementing sharding allowing on-chain scaling.
33.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
8 years to change the value of a constant!
34.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
>Who decides? Every user of the system. >How? Mostly by taking in consideration the differences of the software from both chains.
35.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
True. OP said hard forks and I talked about natural forks. I don't see any problem in hard forks and being able to stake on multiple chains. Let people hard fork as much as they want and decide, later on, which chains hold value.
36.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
Proof of Work (PoW) is inherent inferior to Proof of Stake (PoS). PoW is just the most simple way to archive consensus through cryptoeconomic incentives and that is why first blockchains implemented it. It is not true that on PoS you can mi
37.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
Ethereum's blocktime is way shorter: 10 seconds. You usually want multiple blocks to be finalized, from 3 to 6 to be sure you are on the longer chain. The proposed blockchain solution for this are state channels where payments are then
38.
by diegocerdan 9y ago
Feasible development and such a game changing off-chain scaling technology. Way to go, Raiden!
39.
by diegocerdan 10y ago
I'm looking for a CMS that outputs static generated pages with a progressive web app approach. Any references?
40.
by diegocerdan 10y ago
Some years ago I created Mapturbate using the Leaflet and the Chaturbate webcam feed. Definitely NSFW. http://mapturbate.com