didibus

5 ms·

61.
by didibus 3mo ago
Correct, the claim here is that this is better because cache locality is too big a hit and not worth the trade off. I don't know if this is true or not and likely depends on workload. I think they might say you need to rewrite your lon
62.
by didibus 3mo ago
I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like Tina forces your IO to be return values. You can't actually do IO inside the Isolate handlers, so your compute code runs and returns the next IO operation to run. That's what it meant by y
63.
by didibus 3mo ago
The suggested alternative is interesting, I was expecting a Rust library though, but it's an Odin one. What's missing are any sort of benchmarks or proof of the claims that it will scale beyond the issues the article discuss.
64.
by didibus 3mo ago
Great read, thanks for sharing!
65.
by didibus 3mo ago
I think number of features released to customers (not behind a feature flag or still being rolled out, but fully rolled out). And number of bug fixes (only those reported by customers). Also just in general, customer satisfaction, acquisiti
66.
by didibus 3mo ago
Article did a decent job of showing discipline and care and human involvement to assert the automated rewrite was done diligently, as best as it can be when using AI for it. I does make me feel a bit more comfortable about it. As an aside,
67.
by didibus 3mo ago
> to exhaustively come up with reasons why the changes create bugs or do not work My biggest issue currently, is I can't seem to get a code review that's about the simplicity of the code, and no /simplify ain't it. Re
68.
by didibus 3mo ago
That's true, that's a money constraint, which hopefully would mean as they gain more paying users, they can scale their index further, and rely less and less on other indexes.
69.
by didibus 3mo ago
Ya, because the upstream repos already did the majority of the work to port the game to Linux and MacOS. This fork used Fable to add iOS support with touch controls.
70.
by didibus 3mo ago
The port to MacOS is from the parent upstream repo, which also has it working on Linux, this fork added iOS support.
71.
by didibus 3mo ago
It added iOS support, the upstream repo had already ported the game to Linux and MacOS.
72.
by didibus 3mo ago
Diff of the changes Fable added to the parent fork (which does not appear to have used AI): https://github.com/ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad/compare... for those curious.
73.
by didibus 3mo ago
It seems it didn't: > Built on EA's GPL v3 source release via fbraz3/GeneralsX (which did the heavy lifting of the macOS/Linux port — this fork adds the iOS/iPadOS port and a set of engine fixes) Fable added 19 c
74.
by didibus 3mo ago
I'm confused, that's just a feed?
75.
by didibus 3mo ago
SearXNG is different though, because it still relies on a data-harvesting, ad-driven online economy. Off course if all you care about is privacy, might be fine, not sure how good it is at hiding you, but if you care more about not having yo
76.
by didibus 4mo ago
I see, so just major refactor, or almost live-rewrite of a very messy code base, but mostly in the medium/small design space. Ya that makes total sense. It's mostly we already did this and have figured out the ambiguities, we just
77.
by didibus 4mo ago
> I don't have too much unknowns in my work, I simply have way too much to do. Interesting, I'm curious what work you do? My software engineering career has never been in that situation, it's always so much ambiguity and u
78.
by didibus 4mo ago
I'm getting a bit tired of these disguised adverts. Here's how non robotics engineers used AI to do a short robot integration task faster than other non robotics engineers without AI. Where "better" mostly means faster,
79.
by didibus 4mo ago
Same, I use Spacemacs in holy mode, which is spacemacs with normal emacs key bindings and not vi modals, but still I wish there was a good config that was straight up emacs bindings and didn't pull in evil at all.
80.
by didibus 4mo ago
Has something changed since you last told me: > I think Gloat/Glojure has the best hosted runtime story because of its AOT to Go src pipeline - you can grab anything Go at compile time. OTOH let-go can roundtrip any Go value includi
81.
by didibus 4mo ago
I believe this is the most promising Clojure hosted on Go, as their has been a few recently, this is the only one with full proper interop.
82.
by didibus 4mo ago
For sure, we'd need to be careful about implementation. Maybe we can't come up with a good version and decide not to do it. But we should at least be able to discuss the problem. Some people seem to think it's totally fine fo
83.
by didibus 4mo ago
Why do you think ownership should be uncapped and allowed to capture majority of wealth? PG is absolutely right, if you want to be a billionaire, you need accelerated growth, you need to find something that a large number of people will pay
84.
by didibus 4mo ago
Not really. That's why I said no one can work a billion times smarter. There is a "hack" to wealth, and PG has explained it here. You need a large addressable market with little competition where you can capture a small amoun
85.
by didibus 4mo ago
> On what? On the business income, on the sale of shares, on their wealth, on loans, on estate and inheritance, etc. Breaking up the company is another avenue, it could increase competitiveness and make the markets freer, open up more op
86.
by didibus 4mo ago
Uh, pay cuts due to financial problems of the business happens all the time.
87.
by didibus 4mo ago
You make the law whatever you want and those become the terms. Either agree to them or you're not allowed to operate a business here. That's how taxation and other regulation work. You're free to operate a business in another
88.
by didibus 4mo ago
She's saying nobody can truly work a billion times more, a billion times harder, a billion times smarter, so nobody can actually earn a billion dollars. Given that, how can some people be worth as much? There has to be some capture of
89.
by didibus 4mo ago
> If the company makes an unexpectedly large profit, the employer is not obligated to redistribute that to her employees in addition to the already agreed-upon and paid compensation. What if they were ? That's the whole point of the
90.
by didibus 4mo ago
tax?

More ›