didibus

47 ms·

691.
by didibus 3y ago
I think this is great insight. It reflects why I often feel like I'm having to be the product and program manager as well. Even though I'm not, so often ideas on what could be improved, what could be done better, how to do things
692.
by didibus 3y ago
No, donations to the non-profit do not transfer. They're considered a donation, you get a tax right off and that's that. I think OP is saying she is calling her investment in the for-profit arm a "donation". Which is kin
693.
by didibus 3y ago
Donations are to the non-for-profit, but now that there is a for-profit arm, private investors can purchase "stock" if you want. Share of the company that grants them some percentage of the company profit (when it eventually start
694.
by didibus 3y ago
She's not in charge of the for-profit arm though, all she could do was fire the CEO, and she did, which would seem consistent with her criticism. I don't think she has many more power as being on the board. She also isn't at
695.
by didibus 3y ago
I feel the people advocating safety, while they are probably right from a moral and ethics point of view, are just doomed to fail. It's like with the Nuclear Bomb, it's not like had Einstein withheld his contributions, we wouldn&#
696.
by didibus 3y ago
> when you serve on the board of directors for that company I'm not sure if this is the true statement, because the not-for-profit/profit arms make it more complex. In this case, the non-for-profit board seems to act as a kind
697.
by didibus 3y ago
> Ms. Toner disagreed. The board’s mission is to ensure that the company creates artificial intelligence that “benefits all of humanity,” and if the company was destroyed, she said, that could be consistent with its mission We're in
698.
by didibus 3y ago
Could you have really predicted this aftermath? I mean, it could have just been that Sam is gone, a new CEO joins, and things move on. For example, as a paying user of OpenAI, I don't really care, as long as they continue to produce so
699.
by didibus 3y ago
Occam Razors would say so. That's my take as well. They just underestimated the fanboy level of religious following that tech CEOs now possess and the scale of impact that would lead too. From their point of view, it was just business
700.
by didibus 3y ago
I find this very surprising. How do people conclude that OpenAI's success is due to its business leadership from Sam Altman, and not from it's technological leadership and expertise driven by Illya and the others? Their asset isn&
701.
by didibus 3y ago
She tweeted it herself: https://twitter.com/phuckfilosophy/status/145969637613300121... https://twitter.com/phuckfilosophy/status/163570439893983232...
702.
by didibus 3y ago
I'm still surprised how little attention there has been on the fact that Sam Altman's sister is accusing him of sexually assaulting her when she was younger. His own sister, even if it's not true, it reflects poorly to have t
703.
by didibus 3y ago
But OpenAI is a non for profit that was exploring a goal that it saw financial incentives as misaligned. It's what kind of got it achieved. Because every other company didn't really see the benefit of going straight to AGI, instea
704.
by didibus 3y ago
I think the question mark is if AI is more akin to the nuclear bomb of the Internet. If you don't put barriers, how quickly will AI bots take over people in online discourse, interaction and publication? This isn't just for the sa
705.
by didibus 3y ago
Waning days of the career associated with it. Similar to how old craftsmanship has been superseded by machine/industrialisation. The need for mastery of the craft will be lesser, and so mastery of it will wane, as people depend on AI i
706.
by didibus 3y ago
I feel you're not enjoying looking for evidence of your claims as much as I am. But sure, it says: > Vaccine mandates were primarily advocated to decrease severe COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, protect healthcare systems, ensur
707.
by didibus 3y ago
I feel like legislation has a bloat problem. As people get elected, they all feel the need to "do" something. And all they can do is propose bills. Over time, doesn't that mean we just end up with more and more legislation ab
708.
by didibus 3y ago
I was even more curious, and it's pretty hard to search for what information was available on the web in early 2021. So don't judge me, but using ChatGPT is the fastest way I could think to get an idea. This is what chatGpt thinks
709.
by didibus 3y ago
I feel there's plenty of space for children to tinker, even in an accept list scenario. In fact, it's more so the spaces that empower you to create that would be on it, since they involve no "dangerous" social interactio
710.
by didibus 3y ago
> I have a hard time believing you somehow missed fauci or Walenski or ALL of the mainstream media going on for months about the vaccine preventing transmission I guess I did. Axios has been my primary news source, along with New York Ti
711.
by didibus 3y ago
Somewhere along the way I feel it became normal to just let your children do whatever they want online with no supervision and no parental controls. And at the same time I do think computer providers, Windows, Mac OS and all that don't
712.
by didibus 3y ago
Yes, that's my point. So if you need to predict which conclusion is more likely the actual reality, picking the one made by more experienced individuals on the subject, who have spent more time studying, experimenting and observing the
713.
by didibus 3y ago
I was asking clarification, because it all depends what we mean about truth and lie here. If we're saying that reduction in transmission is a lie, well that might be false, as data now seem to indicate it does cause reduced transmissio
714.
by didibus 3y ago
I was never under the impression that there were any trials specifically about transmission. I can believe some people said or published articles saying that it would reduce transmission, I'm not sure they'd all claim it was from
715.
by didibus 3y ago
> The mRNA shots were not tested at all for transmissibility yet we were told they prevented transmission Data that has come out since does seem to indicate it lowers transmission. But I'm unclear if you're trying to say that t
716.
by didibus 3y ago
> Time and time again, from the lockdowns/restrictions to the forced masking to the forced shots to the censorship to pretty much everything in between, the "expert consensus" from the medical, political, and mass media co
717.
by didibus 3y ago
I've been doing intermittent fasting for years now, and I've not continued to lose weight past a small initial drop. Only way I can lose weight is if I also start restricting calories.
718.
by didibus 3y ago
I feel like we're just getting more precise. It's not actually true that all men are physically stronger than all women. Some men are physically stronger than some women, and some women are physically stronger than some men. In th
719.
by didibus 3y ago
Right, so I think people understand inflation. But apart from that? At least I didn't understand OP as meaning that growth is meant to keep lowering prices and raising wages even in the presence of inflation.
720.
by didibus 3y ago
I hear you, but I'm not sure it truly resolved the question of the premise. You claim the data isn't there to learn human like thinking. But it's not substantiated. It's possible the sum total of all human writing does e

More ›