Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
didibus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
631.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Ya, I think this is a great insight. In today's world, code is not released as a versioned artifact sold on a disc or downloaded. The idea of "shipping" is fuzzy. You might be 100% in production with some change and it could
632.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Resume is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Ql6AydCJ7-XhjrwEqzmRAaA... Looks like: ZenDesk and GitHub are the "big tech". Projects shipped look like: * Documentation portal * Refactor of s
633.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
The source is not open, so not open source. It's as simple as that to me. That doesn't mean you can't allow the modification of your weights, but a model is not open source because it lets you modify its weights. If we take t
634.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
My guess is this comes down to funding, and having to choose if the money will go to spend more time with students that struggle, to help them out, or with students that excel, to boost them further. And we really shouldn't be having t
635.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
I think it depends how people interpret neutral. Choosing what to talk about or not in itself has influence. It's impossible to be a newspaper and not in any way help or support one side over another in a conflict, even if you don'
636.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
> its really interesting to contrast this "outsider" definition of open ai with people with real money at stake I guess this is a question of what we want out of "open source". Companies want to make money. Their asse
637.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
That's kind of true for normal programs as well, depending on the compiler you use, and if it has non-deterministic processes in it's compilation. But still, it's about being able to reproduce the same build process, and get
638.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
I agree. If it's open source, surely I can at least "compile" it myself. If the data is missing, I can't do that. We'll end up with like 5 versions of the same "open source" model, all performing different
639.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
> Maybe the supporter of the definition could demonstrate practically modifying a ML model without using the original training data, and show that it is just as easy as with the original data and it does not limit what you can do with it
640.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Well, quite a few people already use AOT with PGO from GraalVM to build native executables of Clojure programs. Those start stupidly fast. I never heard of anyone doing so with OpenJ9, how good is the AOT of OpenJ9? AppCDs in OpenJDK curren
641.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
FP in CL is kind of optional, and it's also more in the sense that you can pass functions as arguments or return functions, meaning FP == First Class Functions. But in Clojure, FP is kind of mandatory, there's no OO for example, a
642.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
It's just: (let [[quotient remainder] (floor x y)] (+ (* quotient z) (* remainder (first (floor z y))))) Because in Clojure there's no multiple value bind, when you want to return many results from a functi
643.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Ya, so you'll be working with the DB directly instead of through an Object representation. And I agree with you, it's less features, and maybe it would be nice to have something similar in Clojure, but there's a reason the fe
644.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Well, there are objects through interop, and under the hood everything is compiled into one. But when you develop an app, you won't be defining classes and instantiating objects of them, you'll be instead writing functions that re
645.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Can you talk more about these?
646.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
In Clojure you'll have to write the queries yourself unfortunately. People always ask, where is the fully fledged web framework in Clojure? There isn't one. Why there isn't one is hard to answer, but it's partially becau
647.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
There's no object in Clojure, so there's no need for an Object Relational Mapper. You just work directly of the query result sets, which the SQL library itself can conveniently turn into rows of maps if you prefer (over rows of li
648.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
What's so different to Clojure's ? (let [a 1 [b c] (list 2 3) [d e] [4 5]] `(~a ~b ~c ~d ~e)) ;; => (1 2 3 4 5)
649.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Nice catch. Is it an issue though when the script injection only runs within your own browser session?
650.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Clojure also teaches you functional programming, where-as CL only teaches you the LISP beauty. Clojure teaches you both Lisp and Fp. So the FP part should still be worth it even though you got the Lisp part from CL.
651.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
I mean... That's not an issue in other runtimes, so it's kind of a JVM quirk no?
652.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
Well, it's still partially the JVM at play. For example, if your application has big classes, and many classes, the JVM will be slow to start. This is what is happening here. Clojure is like a large-ish Java project, it has big classes
653.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
You still don't see many scripts or CLI apps in Java though. I was wondering if that would change now that you can run a source file directly, but then wouldn't the startup be slower, because now it's also having to compile.
654.
▲
by
didibus
2y ago
There is Supplemental Security Income in the US. And I think in Canada and Europe there are even more government subsidies available.
655.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
My understanding is that Google's behavior was seen as strong-arming their way into signing non-competitive agreements with competitors. For example, they'd make a deal with Samsung that if they want Google services on Samsung pho
656.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
Microsoft Word (pre-office-365 days) VS Google Docs basically.
657.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
Isn't this a matter of distribution. Like the amount of republican richer people might be small and so doesn't impact the metric for more educated people are more democrat, even though more richer people are educated. Since every
658.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
Scientists don't really ask for policies. That's the job of politicians. I'm not sure why they'd apologize for it. Scientists just provide data and options. It's still true that the measures slowed down spread. That
659.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
In this example, it's relatively limited I feel to finding new algorithms/functions. Which is great, but compared to the discovery of fire, and tons of things in between, like say electricity, it wouldn't feel in the same bal
660.
▲
by
didibus
3y ago
I wish they also talked about latency, because now what I want is for cloud gaming, video calls, and other real time use cases to get extremely responsive and latency free. Beyond 1 gig, I'm not sure I'd notice much difference in
More ›