Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
diarrhea
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
571.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Probably a Ponzi, not a pyramid, scheme, no?
572.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
The worst searches I have encountered are Thunderbird and Discord. While Google is the gold standard, there's a whole range between the former two and the latter. Just fuzzy search goes a long way, but it seems Thunderbird and Discord
573.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Great read on Jupyter Notebooks. I've always had a strong dislike for them as well - just feel fuzzy, dirty, often in weird state - and the user put it into words nicely. I might just be bad with Jupyter, but I've been willing to
574.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
TST does look great. Not sure it's usable in my case: - similar to what others mentioned, I'm running a browser at 50% width of fullscreen (27", 4K display). This is ideal for most websites: it's about as narrow as most
575.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
I actually prefer having as many different colors as possible. A class definition is orange, functions are pink, strings are green, ... (Material theme). It's just very clear at a glance. If everything's a subtle shade of one colo
576.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
But essentially recruiting PhD students to reverse engineer/"examine" a competitor's software is twisted.
577.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
I would argue in conjunction with zfs snapshots (can be every minute), it's safe and the caveat no longer applies.
578.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Maybe this is good enough for your use case: https://dangerzone.rocks/ It converts documents to just images, then converts those back to PDF, all in a sandbox.
579.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
It's great and I use it almost every day: paperless-ng uses it in the background.
580.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
rga is one of my favorite tools ever.
581.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
There are fundamental thermodynamical limits to certain processes involving energy transfer, conversion etc. Heat transfer comes to mind. Those cannot be engineered away. For simple mechanical systems, yes, inefficiencies can be removed, bu
582.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
There's research on this: https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2021/april-...
583.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Among Firefox, uBlock Origin, AdGuard Home and buying (for a couple dollars) ad-free versions of apps I use frequently, the web is virtually entirely ad-free for me. It blows my mind that it's different for most people. Every time I us
584.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> It's mostly happening behind the scenes (which we're not a massive fan of) but it's a step in the right direction. Why is an increasing adoption of blockchain a step in the right direction?
585.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> So what about when you can only see half of the car? Like when it’s changing lanes or pulling out of a parking spot? You know, like those times when a signal is MOST useful? I don't understand how this is different with any other
586.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
I had trouble believing that (astronomic scales always seem so much more vast), but it checks out (SI units): p = 1e5 l = 38.6e9 * 1.61 A = 0.27871 R_m = 8.3141 M_CO2 = 12 + 16 * 2 R = R_m / (M_CO2 / 1000
587.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
That's true but assumes the captured CO2 remains that, captured. The article revolves around the idea of turning CO2 into fuel . Fuel which is burned, releasing that same CO2 again while having wasted a lot of intermediate energy. At
588.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
And what do you get by replacing one ICE vehicle in Europe with an electric one? You get two cars. A shiny new electric one running in (Central) Europe, and that same old stinky ICE one running in Eastern Europe, Asia or Africa. The poore
589.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
It's even worse than zero net effect, it's negative, owed to all the auxiliary inefficiencies. Add to that methane slip and it's infeasible by a long shot. The solution can never be to remedy surface-level GHG. The sources ne
590.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
I'm doubtful 7h of sleep a night and 1 drink a day can render a given individual more mentally able. I'd guess the causation is that the cognitively most able people just happened to average on these values. I sleep 8 to 9h a day
591.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
I don't know why you are being downvoted. You are correct, and some ICEs (large, maritime) are hitting 50% even. For a thermal engine , that's incredibly good (it's not about the gap to 100%, but the gap to Carnot efficiency
592.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Large scale, yes, I'd say so.
593.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Not wrong! However: - batteries: not available large-scale - thermal storage: potentially terribly inefficient (but as I said, yes it's at least something!) - pumped hydroelectric: where I'm from, only available to a tiny fraction
594.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> C02 CO2, you mean!
595.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> inefficiencies inherent in the compressors and turbines This is not why such thermal engines/plants perform (well below) 100% efficiency. You could have isentropic (i.e., ideal, working losslessly) components and will probably sti
596.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
NOx (and PM) is a local, temporary consequence. Catalysts exist to remove NOx out of exhaust gasses. They are perfectly serviceable. Carbon dioxide is a permanent, global issue, where no (large-scale) capturing/cleaning methods exist.
597.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
You're comparing apples and oranges. The around 40% efficiency modern ICEs have is thermal . The 90%+ going from battery to electric motor is not thermal. You're just converting high-exergy to high-exergy (kinetic) at that point.
598.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> The 33kWh per kilo of hydrogen That's just a physical material property of hydrogen itself. It has nothing at all to do with anything else. 1kg of hydrogen has a (lower, not upper) calorific value of about 33 kWh, period. Doesn&#x
599.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
> that puts the hydrogen at roughly 15kWh of useful energy. That's not the hydrogen's fundamental fault as a medium. It's the fault of the conversion process. 33 kWh of thermal to 15 kWh of work, according to your calculat
600.
▲
by
diarrhea
5y ago
Efficiency is not a huge concern when highly fluctuating energy from renewable sources is involved. You either have zero efficiency because it goes to waste for lack of storage, or some efficiency through hydrogen (electrolysis).
More ›