dialup_sounds

43 ms·

421.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
You miss the point with the RED: it's normal with any camera to use a different lens to achieve certain shots, and nobody calls it fake. They did not say "look how good our phone is" for those shots or suggest they were made
422.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Are they? These are some shots from a presentation video about iPads with one sentence at the end saying it was shot with iPhones. They never said anything about it in the video. If they shot it with RED and a similar lens for those shots a
423.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
You're trying to use emotional language to avoid actually thinking about the question. The correct answer is b, and the alternative is just plain banditry. You don't have an automatic right to compensation or audience for your wor
424.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
I would not bet against any company on the basis of people whinging on the internet unless it's about their actual product or service being bad at it's job. (e.g. Humane and Rabbit are probably doomed) Consider that when talking a
425.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Is attaching a lens to a camera to achieve a shot really considered faking it?
426.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Finish the thought. How do they profit from someone else's creative work? Is it a) by just taking it because they can? or b) by mutual agreement with the original creator?
427.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
There is no "particular group" or "everyone else". Everyone has rights over their own creative work, even if that's mildly inconvenient to others. It's part of the social contract of modern society.
428.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
It seems weirdly arbitrary to say that tools people have been using in production aren't "production tools".
429.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Kinda weird to exclude Procreate, Affinity, Final Cut, Logic, etc. from your definition of content creation. The trend has clearly been more professional and creative apps year over year and ever more capable devices to run them on. I mean,
430.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Interestingly, Apple still sells M1 Airs through Walmart, but not their own website.
431.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
Most people that consider themselves "power users" aren't even power users, either. Like how being into cars doesn't make you a race car driver.
432.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
'Cat out of the bag' would be 'we have specific evidence that allows us to prosecute a specific executive for criminal negligence or manslaughter'. That would be why you might kill someone, to save your own skin. Is th
433.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
We know less about what's happening internally That's literally what both of these guys already made public at different times about different facilities. Is there reason to think they had additional information that they just d
434.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
That doesn't make any sense. You're calling someone ignorant for favoring evidence over hearsay and hysteria. That's the exact opposite of witch trials, where the whole concept is finding guilt without evidence.
435.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
I'm baffled by this comment. It's exceedingly rare for two middle-aged and otherwise healthy people to die without warning. Suicide is the 7th leading cause of death for men 55-62. It's considerably more common than murder.
436.
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
* The limiting factor of this attack is that a marketplace must first be approved by Apple before it can undertake this sort of tracking. * Seems like a Catch-22 that Apple is required to support these other marketplaces out of their contro
437.
by dialup_sounds 3y ago
In a typical department store the employee would escort you to the register to pay immediately or hold it there until you're ready. There is usually a register in the department. If they do just hand over the merchandise there's a
438.
by dialup_sounds 3y ago
That's commonly repeated but it's misleading for at least two reasons. Firstly, employee-related shrinkage includes inventory control and accounting errors ("paper shrink") in addition to employee theft. These are often