Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dgellow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
You misunderstood what I meant, I’m talking about re-playing the same part of the conversation multiple times and getting inconsistent answers. With the exact same turns, aka the same history. Obviously with a temperature that isn’t set to
62.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
They need to distance themselves from the increasing likelihood of legal repercussions after their systems have been found to commit what could reasonably be seen as felonies. That’s my guess at least. Though for once I do actually agree wi
63.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
64.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
If you rewind my brain I expect to give you a similar answer to the one I gave you before. Which isn’t the case for LLM. You can literally replay a positive answer, then get a negative response that isn’t consistent at all with the one it p
65.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
They don’t have persistent memory though. Models are static, what you have is a model that will reprocess the whole series of prompts + some data fetched from a data store. A harness is just a while loop prompting an LLM and executing tool
66.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
The fact that you can have a long and meaningful discussion, then can literally just re-run any part of that whole conversation and get a different, inconsistent response is a pretty good sign there is no entity there
67.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
Why would you assume it is revolutionary?
68.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
Sounds like the plot of a Douglas Adam’s book
69.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
It cannot be the AI vendor, according to what they say they are purely passive, think of them like a very large harness for their AI models. It’s not the advertising companies of course, as you said they don’t control the system. And it can
70.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
I see tabs with a spinner loading infinitely, which is indeed very salesforce like
71.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
But that’s not how the label will be interpreted in real life
72.
▲
by
dgellow
25d ago
> but the costs for doing so are comparably high You will find pre made kits to do that exact thing in a few weeks/months on alibaba and similar
73.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
Side note: it took me more time than I would like to admit to realize that Diogo Almeida isn’t a satirical version of the name Dario Amodei
74.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
Right now Trump is the wild card you have to take in account. He’s influencing the SPY way more than the AI trade
75.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
I don’t think that many people have read Piketty given how dense his work is. I’m glad I share my native language with him which makes it a bit easier to understand some of his points, but his writing is really difficult to grasp IMHO
76.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
Likely germany, we have very strict recording laws. It’s actually stricter on audio recording, due to Germany’s history: you’re not allowed to record people without their consent if they could expect privacy, which includes outside when for
77.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
Flag and move on
78.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
It will be all about immigration and cost of life crisis. And of course the general finger pointing at the EU bogeyman
79.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
AI isn’t even remotely the issue here, it’s Trump war and other insane behaviors
80.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
That’s a bit unfair, Dario Amodei has written in this topic a lot since around mid 2010s IIRC, Anthropic too published a good amount of stuff on similar topics. I don’t think the lack of consideration is really the issue here. It’s more a
81.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
I’m happy to do it
82.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
You can shoot them. But also, you can just stop sending them to space. It’s not like an AI will build and control space ships to replace and maintain its network in space… It’s sort of absurd how human agency is ignored in all those sci-fi
83.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
I would assume so, yes. Likely went from really wealthy to insanely wealthy
84.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
Definitely changed Ive’s world with that massive paycheck!
85.
▲
by
dgellow
26d ago
I think it’s because apple has no competition with regards to audio, there is close to no pressure to document and QA things properly
86.
▲
by
dgellow
27d ago
I don’t understand what you mean by snappy. Apple is notorious for releasing buggy macOS major versions. You wait 6 months, then upgrade without having to be their tester. Snappiness has nothing to do with that, any macOS version on apple s
87.
▲
by
dgellow
27d ago
Only if you ignore their losses. They are saying they are profitable when not counting their training costs and other expenses. That’s not a good sign at all
88.
▲
by
dgellow
27d ago
I would recommend to read the article, it’s actually more nuanced than the title
89.
▲
by
dgellow
27d ago
I think you should have read the article first, at minimum the subheader > Discounting the opinions of LLM judges with highly correlated outputs ensures that panels of judges reflect a true diversity of perspectives.
90.
▲
by
dgellow
27d ago
Given the entire hardware world is experiencing multiple important shortages that are unlikely to improve before a while, I wouldn’t bet on it
More ›