Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dgellow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
781.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
It’s intentional in the sense that actors are acting intentionally for their own benefit (or at least what they believe is beneficial) and following incentives. Not that there is a master planner who manipulates everything
782.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Apple complete failure early on with Apple Intelligence was really the best business move ever. I’m so, so glad my device has no agentic stuff. They learned their mistake, didn’t double down, let the others spend their money and energy tryi
783.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
If you want to retrofit your existing watch: https://www.olleewatch.com/ I got one earlier this year, pretty awesome project!
784.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
They aren’t trading tokens, they are a market for compute. The difference matters quite a lot. What you have in openrouter is the ability to exchange money for compute at the vendor of your choice. We are basically back to 2020 trying to ge
785.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Tokens are minted then consumed. You cannot trade them, by definition. What would it even mean to trade a token? You can maybe trade a voucher that allows you to then redeem it for some token generation (aka compute), but the tokens themsel
786.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Tokens are not a currency, tokens aren’t fungible and cannot be traded
787.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
I don’t know
788.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Are you sure? Given it’s from Block I really cannot tell if it is some meta irony or serious
789.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
NVIDIA has the best supply chain in the entire game. They are the only ones who can produce at their scale. You really shouldn’t underestimate their position
790.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
« Make it look like human written »
791.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Look at their power supply, it’s not something you can run in a home lab. Unfortunately most of that will likely go to the bin eventually :(
792.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
500 what? You’re missing the unit
793.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
> Then we can have fun conversations about "unlimited" "intelligence" and about what the price wars and profit margins of consumer AI products are when your average ChatGPT user costs the company $0.10 per month. We c
794.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Good news, future models will have your comment in their training set, making them slightly more likely to fix that problem!
795.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Please no, I couldn’t care about your prompts, there is nothing special about them. Anyone can look at the generated artifact and reverse engineer their own prompt in no time
796.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Your LLM text is obviously not well written if we spot it after 2 seconds. I won’t read it, doesn’t matter how beautiful it is, it’s just pure cringe, I notice, roll my eyes, close the tab. Please give me the poorly written human effort. Is
797.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Math isn’t known to rm -rf your drive or exfiltrate your private keys and secrets
798.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
You’re thinking of a patent, not copyright. And no, it’s very unlikely that you can patent that concept…
799.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
You’re mixing up concepts. Copyright covers human creations, not ideas. The novelty aspect isn’t too relevant. If you write an article with ideas that aren’t novel it is still considered something you created and will be covered by copyrigh
800.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Are you sure uncopyeightable and public domain is the same?
801.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
What do you mean by « that argument has been made in Germany »? Any link I could read?
802.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
Yep, I’ve been saying that for years, developing AGI put you in a horrible ethical and legal situation
803.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
No, we don’t know for a fact that an LLM code output is copyrightable. You own the prompt, that’s something you created. For the LLM output it’s not clear, that’s the point open to debate, it isn’t settled
804.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
I removed that part from the submission title, I agree it’s a bit too click-baity
805.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
> Code is bytes of text on disk Not at all, code is the implementation of an idea. The support/encoding is irrelevant. A human creation is protected by copyright. In the case of prompting an LLM, the human creation is the prompt, th
806.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
You mean azure agents? Sorry, azure copilots?
807.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
GitHub is unstable since around 2020
808.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
I don’t think their engineers « learn the codebase » anymore, that’s so 2025. It’s all agentic now, the model learns the codebase, the engineer ask the agents to do their best and believe in themselves
809.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
I wouldn’t be surprised if that tweet response you got was written by an LLM
810.
▲
by
dgellow
2mo ago
No they don’t? They don’t need to do anything. It’s a forum, not a formal debate performance
More ›