devrand

13 ms·

121.
by devrand 5y ago
Google generally doesn't weigh in as it's all handled between the uploader and the claimant. If the claim is disputed by the uploader then the claimant can accept/reject that dispute. The uploader then has the chance to appea
122.
by devrand 5y ago
Yes, all disputes will get resolved in some way. Worst case is that they drag it out for 60 days. Source: https://creatoracademy.youtube.com/page/lesson/respond-to-co...
123.
by devrand 5y ago
Only applies for Content ID, which seems to be the case in this particular situation. For a DMCA claim the video comes down while the dispute is being worked out.
124.
by devrand 5y ago
Though most (all?) do support enterprise policies via GPO that would cover the vast majority of enterprise use cases.
125.
by devrand 5y ago
As far as I know this is fairly unique to the United States, and even then the crime stats are a bit... strange. Overall crime stats are just coming in at the federal level so the picture is very much incomplete, but if we look at particula
126.
by devrand 5y ago
Conveniently ignoring that there was a global pandemic going on for most of the year with record high unemployment. Crime went up basically as soon as the pandemic started.
127.
by devrand 5y ago
The problem is the name: it's too close to the protected mark. You need to enforce your trademark or else you weaken the protections afforded by it. I doubt it would come to a lawsuit though unless the developer resisted. More than lik
128.
by devrand 5y ago
Only obvious limitation is that they only support that for HLS streams whereas YouTube normally uses DASH.
129.
by devrand 5y ago
ccTLDs are special as they are entirely delegated to the countries that they're assigned to. WIPO offers UDRP servicing for ccTLDs, but they need to opt-in to it [1]. Notably .ar (and .su as the other responder to your comment notes) i
130.
by devrand 5y ago
There's lot of different TLDs each with their own rules, fees, and registrars. It's hard to unify that landscape, particularly when a bunch of ccTLDs have very little infrastructure behind them. The closest you can really get is h
131.
by devrand 5y ago
You should've gotten an e-mail from Github support back in November with the option to reply to request it be deleted.
132.
by devrand 5y ago
As a user, this was exactly my experience. I didn't want to drop my fork since I had open PRs so GitHub support reinstated my fork and gave me a window to rebase it and confirm with them. That's literally all I had to do: rebase i
133.
by devrand 5y ago
Almost certainly not. I'm fairly certain Google is licensing the imagery.
134.
by devrand 5y ago
To make things worse, it's basically impossible to remove a domain from the PSL as no one knows how software built against the PSL would handle it. A removal could break tremendous amount of software that people rely on.
135.
by devrand 5y ago
It sounds like there's two cases: 1. Multi-tenant domains that probably should've always been in the PSL (ex. to provide cookie silos) but are only realizing now that they should be in it due to the arrival of PCM. 2. Sites that w
136.
by devrand 6y ago
The gem is basically a database of mime type, file extension, and magic bytes. The last two are not included in the linked iana database.
137.
by devrand 6y ago
Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. is basically what caused Content ID to come into existence, despite being ruled in Youtube's favor. It was going to go to appeal but a non-monetary settlement was agreed upon, which is why it&
138.
by devrand 6y ago
Can the link/title be updated to the MacRumors article that got a confirmed statement that it’s being discontinued from Apple? https://www.macrumors.com/2021/03/06/apple-confirms-imac-pro...
139.
by devrand 6y ago
My understanding is that registration is not required before infringement occurs, but it is required before a copyright lawsuit can proceed. That is, any lawsuits with regard to a unregistered copyright will be paused until the copyright is
140.
by devrand 6y ago
I looked up his business dealings: he never had anything to do with PayPal, much less being a founder.
141.
by devrand 6y ago
You're quoting a paraphrase of a statement from the CEO of the company about to get the majority of their IPV4 space revoked. Of course they're going to maintain that they're in the right. Where did you find that LACNIC didn&
142.
by devrand 6y ago
Count Two goes into more detail. They claim that AWS is calling this a service suspension as they're retaining the data and are helping to facilitate the transfer out of AWS. Parler disputes this and calls it a termination of the contr
143.
by devrand 6y ago
I think they restrict the 2FA methods since they want tighter control over them. For example, if you use their Steam app for 2FA and you need to move it to a new phone your account gets put into a restricted mode and you cannot use the Comm
144.
by devrand 6y ago
Sure, but it's entirely irrelevant to a private company. The quote was in reference to government tyranny, not some rule imposed by a private company. The spirit of the Second Amendment isn't to encourage a well-armed militia to o
145.
by devrand 6y ago
How is the First Amendment in any way related to YouTube?
146.
by devrand 6y ago
This doesn't claim that they're infringing on the copyright of their API, rather that they infringed on their copyrighted code (even if the code is just declaring the API). It's fairly unlikely that someone would reimplement
147.
by devrand 6y ago
Ah, to clarify my donation-based suggestion was for users to donate, not companies. Regardless, yes, if the majority of the money comes from a minority of the userbase (whether it be users and/or companies), you're going to have a
148.
by devrand 6y ago
Sure, you can up the window to a year, or pay the normal rate for B2 on top of your subscription (albeit you don't pay transfer costs). However, you still need to rotate the data and Backblaze doesn't exactly make that process eas
149.
by devrand 6y ago
It's a bit of a different model though since Consumer Reports are often producing the reviews themselves (which may or may not include some survey data from users) and have first-hand experience to editorialize. With things like Yelp [
150.
by devrand 6y ago
Backblaze kind of limits this by requiring their backup client to have seen a given file in the last 30 days. Beyond that the file is eligible to be pruned. So in practice people dumping data into Backblaze can only keep it there for 30 day

More ›