devjab

9 ms·

61.
by devjab 1y ago
> Not familiar with that but I imagine that is going to be a controversial statement. I'm not sure if it's fair to call it rigging, but there was a massive smear campaign against a judge nominated for their constitutional court
62.
by devjab 1y ago
I wonder if they will eventually go the LEGO route and host their shows on youtube while also letting streaming services have them.
63.
by devjab 1y ago
I work with Python, Node and Go and I don't think any of them have great package systems. Go has an amazing module isolation system and boy do I wish hiding functions within a module/package was as easy in Python as it is in Go. W
64.
by devjab 1y ago
I would argue that "good enough" means that it doesn't add inconvenience or significant cost, but I know what you're talking about. That is the flip-side of it though, there is already so much non-AI garbage that it some
65.
by devjab 1y ago
I think it depends a lot on what you're trying to get them to do and what you're working on. I don't really buy into the whole "prompt engineering" part. I use agents quite a lot, but they have limitations. They exc
66.
by devjab 1y ago
I think it'll be hard to find a LLM that actually respects your privacy regardless whether or not you pay. Even with the "privacy" enterprise Co-Pilot from Microsoft with all their promises of respecting your data, it's
67.
by devjab 1y ago
Djangi-ninja is excellent, but it's still Django and when you aren't using a lot of the "batteries included" then you're not really using Django. I mentioned SQLAlchemy which is already "fighting Django" c
68.
by devjab 1y ago
With uvicorn.
69.
by devjab 1y ago
There is a rather big difference between traditional SQLAlchemy and Advanced Alchemy which is also made by Litestar. We've build with pure SQL and with SQLAlchemy in the past, but since we transitioned from django ninja to Litestar, we
70.
by devjab 1y ago
In my experience a lot our "google engineers" now do both. We tend to preach that they go to the documentation first, since that will almost always lead to actual understanding of what they are working on. Eventually most of them
71.
by devjab 1y ago
They sell survailance tools and platforms with heavy AI/ML integration. Tools that frankly have no real rivals for most western countries, since we still consider it better to hand all our data over to USA than other nations with simil
72.
by devjab 1y ago
I think it would be fitting to call knives which sole purpose is to stab people evil. A trench knife for instance would have no purpose in the modern world outside of being evil.
73.
by devjab 1y ago
For many of us UML has been completely irrelevant for decades. If you're deep down the OOP rabbit hole, then UML can have it's place in helping you keep track of your hierarchies. If you use it then I'd assume that getting yo
74.
by devjab 1y ago
I see that you're not from Scandinavia. Here in Denmark the weeks around the first frost are infamous for people crashing in heaps because they were too slow to get their winter tires on and drove as usual. People here generally overes
75.
by devjab 1y ago
What makes you think AI companies aren't already adding advertising into their LLM responses?
76.
by devjab 1y ago
In my world that isn't inherently a bad thing. Granted, I belong to the YAGNI crowd of software engineers who put business before tech architecture. I should probably mention that I don't think this means you should skip on safety
77.
by devjab 1y ago
I've been in SWE in non-enterprise for decades and right now I'm seated with IT and operations because our two teams total less than 15. The amount of users who open tickets with "I have this issue" and then send a scree
78.
by devjab 1y ago
Microsoft is still the best IT business partner for non-tech enterprise organisations. The sort of support you get as a tiny company or a private customer, like the stuff from the article, is similar to what you get from a lot of other tech
79.
by devjab 1y ago
We're into Go and SQLC by extension because we write systems with 0 dependencies outside of the standard library. Which is a security and compliance thing. As far as building something fast, I'm with you. I always reach out for Py
80.
by devjab 1y ago
> SQLC - configuration file (yaml/json) - schema files - query files - understand the meta language in query file comments to generate code you want I would recommend using pg_dump for your schema file which means it'll not be
81.
by devjab 1y ago
We've been running SQLC in production for a while now and I'm curious which part of it you found unintuitive? We run ours as a container service within the development environment that will compile your code from a postgres dump f
82.
by devjab 1y ago
I know it's not exactly the same because these tools are for internal use and never see the public, but react native works well while keeping the maintainence at a minimum. I'm not in on the ops site of device control, but our IT
83.
by devjab 1y ago
I'd argue that it depends on your users. From a business perspective, it's a lot safer for us to release on fridays because failures would not affect a lot of people over the weekend. Of course I do live in a country where you&#x2
84.
by devjab 1y ago
After a couple of decades in the Danish software industry I've come to accept that there is only trunk-based development (COME AT ME!). Feature branches, set releases and so on are fake safety gaps that people add when they don't
85.
by devjab 1y ago
Radon gas is a pretty big thing in construction where I live since our underground is mainly boulder clay (which apparently has or leaks or whatever a lot of radon gas). Anyway, In Denmark a little over 5000 get lung cancer every year, and
86.
by devjab 1y ago
> It's interesting to me that you'd go the hassle of hosting your own SharePoint on prem, but leave it internet facing. I would have assumed a the Venn diagram of these organizations to be entirely contained in orgs forcing you
87.
by devjab 1y ago
I think your point is fair as you can do runtime safety in Go by wrapping Panic, but that's not exactly what Panic is meant to be used for. I guess it's more of a intent vs syntax thing, aside from the part where Panic can be Reco
88.
by devjab 1y ago
I worked with C# for a decade and it's become a really great general purpose language. I'd still prefer never to work with it ever again after having worked with Go. This isn't for technical reasons at all, but because Golang
89.
by devjab 1y ago
Not necessarily, you can task the AI Agent with writing your tool without the use of external dependencies. Often the tool itself will be absolutely horrible, but this doesn't matter if the output of the tool is fine. As in the case of
90.
by devjab 1y ago
Being in the energy sector dependencies is something we intentionally avoid because we'd actually have to go through and review changes. What has helped this immensely is AI code assistance. One of the primary uses is to use it to writ

More ›