detrites

33 ms·

331.
by detrites 4y ago
Do none of these dooming folks realise that a negative impact from an AI can be countered by using a different AI against it? And where does this assumption originate from that there will be only a single AI instead of the diverse multitude
332.
by detrites 4y ago
1. There is nothing to stop someone putting this on >10%-AI generated material. 2. The same argument could be made for "Not with a Computer" and invalidate this website based on identical principles. 3. The future AI brings is
333.
by detrites 4y ago
Here's a kind of barometer I came up with: imagine taking a photo of the moon, and the phone simply outright replaces the photo with a downloaded pristine astrophotography shot from a cloud server, and shows it to the user instead. How
334.
by detrites 4y ago
Not a question, just a comment that after having read several of your posts now, building up knowledge as I go, this one is the first I've understood from start to end. Most satisfying!
335.
by detrites 4y ago
Remember to factor in some 20+ years of technological growth.
336.
by detrites 4y ago
The nuke analogy only applies if the nukes in question also work as anti-nuclear shields. It's also a false equivalency on a much broader fundamental level. AI emboldens all kinds of processes and innovations, not just weapons and defe
337.
by detrites 4y ago
Could this somehow be used against a dynamic resource such as a chatbot to allow fully private interaction?
338.
by detrites 4y ago
What about the glaring safety implications of the custody of this power being in the hands of a relatively small number of people, any of whom may be compelled at any point to divulge that power to those with bad intentions? Secretly? Conv
339.
by detrites 4y ago
Best explanation, thanks! It's so obvious now. By opening the box he knows to be empty, it manufactures an equivalence to if he'd offered to open the box you chose, vs open the other two together.
340.
Lidar Dungeon(github.com)
3 points by detrites 4y ago|0 comments
341.
by detrites 4y ago
Unfortunately, it also swiftly devolves into the issue being discussed... It's not possible to prove whether or not a model can hallucinate or even think, based upon the premise that we have arbitrarily defined what constitutes "t
342.
by detrites 4y ago
Even as a Mac user it can get a bit much.
343.
by detrites 4y ago
> is just patently wrong. Not really, here's one I found in seconds, that I hadn't even seen yet - where they specifically remark on the similarities to AI networks: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126&#x2F
344.
by detrites 4y ago
Actually... > please use the original title, unless it is misleading The policy appears to invite the adding of clarity. Ie, disambiguation in this case.
345.
by detrites 4y ago
How can we confidently state we know ChatGPT doesn't use neurological mechanisms, when we don't yet completely understand our own neurological mechanisms, nor emergent mechanisms that may be at work within ChatGPT? At the same tim
346.
by detrites 4y ago
> a words are merely symbols and not representative of an actual thing. And how could it even know otherwise? ChatGPT is never exposed to things. An interesting argument, what does it mean for the disabled? Eg, if a human had a fully fun
347.
by detrites 4y ago
While it can be customary to trivialise this, the reality is that no "intelligence" is sure if what it's saying may be correct or constitute any kind of "knowledge". At this level a human can't claim to arbiter
348.
by detrites 4y ago
The title misquotes the link: > stty -icanon && cat mario.nes - | nc play-nes.org 4444 stty makes the keyboard work, and "-" is needed after .nes.
349.
Gaming Console on a Stick to Feature Dual Raspberry Pi Chips(tomshardware.com)
2 points by detrites 4y ago|0 comments
350.
by detrites 4y ago
Not an expert, but with a back of a napkin guess, the minimum for say digital HD, might be something like the following: X x Y x colour_bytes x frames x 8bits Eg, 1280x1080x3x60x8=1.99Gbps So at 133Mhz, each cycle the RP2040 would have to p
351.
by detrites 4y ago
Right, that makes sense - thanks for explaining.
352.
by detrites 4y ago
I've tried but cannot come up with another way to interpret it. Do you actually have one?
353.
by detrites 4y ago
If you can't see a link on the internet without an account on a private system, is it really on the internet at all?
354.
by detrites 4y ago
What's the tokens/s on those?
355.
by detrites 4y ago
Yes: > elf32-littlearm, and elf32-bigarm
356.
by detrites 4y ago
*Antarctica
357.
by detrites 4y ago
This really depends on where you are. Some European cities the bike lanes are in constant use, to the point if you're not as accustomed to it as the locals you may well cause an accident if you try join them. (And take care crossing
358.
by detrites 4y ago
That page became extremely confusing until I realised "Deicer" wasn't a brand of airplane.
359.
by detrites 4y ago
Unbelievably, the paper actually makes that claim: > That is, if you toss a coin, you have a 50% chance of correctly choosing the value. In many instances, using a MFM to determine the prior value written to the hard drive was less succe
360.
by detrites 4y ago
Specifically, Apple ][ code copied from Nibble Magazine: https://www.pagetable.com/?p=64 (More details in the recent comments at the bottom.)

More ›