depr

36 ms·

181.
by depr 5y ago
>I guess I don't really see the moral angle here, in one direction or the other. You're only looking from one angle though. Try looking at it from Assange's perspective as GP suggested: >Whereas I believe the GP was mak
182.
by depr 5y ago
>you can serve your WSGI site without a proxy pass, including static sites What about HTTPS?
183.
by depr 6y ago
There is a downside which is all aliases and snippets which assume `master` and no longer work (or work across repositories).
184.
by depr 6y ago
it was sarcasm
185.
by depr 6y ago
Wordperfect files can be opened in MSFT Word ;)
186.
by depr 6y ago
You can run the compiler with --warnings-as-errors
187.
by depr 6y ago
Thinking Fast and Slow is actually pretty flawed as well. See https://retractionwatch.com/2017/02/20/placed-much-faith-und... and e.g. The Bias Bias in Behavioral Economics paper by Gigerenzer. It turns out q
188.
by depr 6y ago
But they don't exist at the moment you make them, so before they exist you have no reason to sacrifice anything for _them_ because there is no _them_. If you give up a job to move somewhere to move to a city to meet your future partner
189.
by depr 6y ago
You are rationalizing in the same way in the other direction
190.
by depr 6y ago
These children didn't exist before you made them, so who exactly are you massively sacrificing your freedom for?
191.
by depr 6y ago
So besides not being alone in old age you also get economic benefits. That does sound interesting.
192.
by depr 6y ago
I think the reason is the shorter version is easier to remember, and people love to attribute genuine wisdom to these kinds of statements. Because the shorter version is easier to remember it is near at hand and got used more.
193.
by depr 6y ago
In some cases, Amazon uses e.g. subsidied wind energy for new data centers. However, this means the renewable energy is not going to neighboring homes, which are instead still using non-renewables.
194.
by depr 6y ago
More to the point: which of those has true e2e encryption?
195.
by depr 6y ago
Looks pretty great to me. I have a great book called Fraktur Mon Amour. Unfortunately it is out of print but if you can still get it somewhere I wholeheartedly recommend it.
196.
by depr 6y ago
In Zettlr, new files are created based on a timestamp by default, e.g. 20200528171636.md. You can add YAML frontmatter like this: --- title: Something --- and the title will be reflected in the file navigator, instead of 20200528171636.md.
197.
by depr 6y ago
>Sometimes, Programs That Use Transactions… Are Worse I understood that reference
198.
by depr 6y ago
Use edeliver https://github.com/edeliver/edeliver
199.
by depr 6y ago
>I personally think that if you cannot convey your ideas in simple language you have failed at communication Not everything can be explained using simple language. Try explaining monads in simple language, or ontology. This video explain
200.
by depr 6y ago
>We cannot just throw up our hands and say "oh well, we'll get 'em next time." But we will
201.
by depr 7y ago
>This is a little disingenuous to the point of almost gaslighting. You don't know what gaslighting is.
202.
by depr 7y ago
The ones we know about is enough
203.
by depr 7y ago
Praised but not believed.
204.
by depr 7y ago
Purser acknowledges that Neale came up with the term in his book, and e.g. here: https://insighttimer.com/blog/ronald-purser-mcmindfulness-we... so I'm not sure that counts as hijacking. Especially as hijacking im
205.
by depr 7y ago
Mindfulness is Buddhist, as Ajahn Brahm explains here: https://youtu.be/fq-nVhcn-dM?t=80 >I did hear recently [someone saying] that Buddhism doesn't own mindfulness, giving a simile, that just because Newton discove
206.
by depr 7y ago
This is explained in the book: “Successful branding stories are often characterized by disruption, which turns an established industry or experience upside down. The MBSR brand is one such disruptive force, with Kabat-Zinn’s talking points
207.
by depr 7y ago
No, just too busy talking about Linux on desktop!
208.
by depr 7y ago
>The ad company can't pester their clients to make changes to the DNS on a regular basis. Many DNS providers have APIs. >And clients won't give control of their DNS to ad company, so automation is also not really possible. S
209.
by depr 7y ago
Yes and no, there's the attack surface of the guest operating system.
210.
by depr 7y ago
So you have to give people access to the entire host! Great. And you can't even do that in cloud environments. And even then you run top on the host and obviously it doesn't know anything about containers because they're not

More ›