Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dent9
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Yes what you are describing is exactly what Kiro solves
32.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Then you are using the wrong AI tools or using them poorly
33.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
AI does not forget requirements when you use a spec driven AI tool like Kiro
34.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Yes you want Kiro which uses Claude models under the hood
35.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
We are way beyond this. Now you use your plain text prompt to generate a requirements spec that the AI will follow when implementing your project https://kiro.dev/
36.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
So your argument is that if people don't use the tool correctly they might get incorrect results? How is that relevant? If you Google search for the wrong query you'll similarly get incorrect results
37.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
95% of companies fail. Yours will too, don't worry. Amazon themselves have already been using in-house versions of this to build AWS for over a year https://kiro.dev/ you can either continue adopting AI in your company
38.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
My man here is reaching out to Klarna Support, this tells a LOT about his life decision making skills which clearly shine through as well in his comments on the topic of AI
39.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
You are wrong. People like yourself will likely be smart enough to stay well employed into the future. It's the folks who are arguing with you trying to say that AI is useless who will quickly lose their jobs. And they'll be all s
40.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Bro idk why you waste your time writing all this. No one cares that you were an early adopter, all that means is that you used the rudimentary LLM implementations that were available from 2022-2024 which are now completely obselete. Whateve
41.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Have you had your head in the sand for the past two years? At the recent AWS conference, they were showcasing Kiro extensively with real life products that have been built with it. And the Amazon developers all allege that they've all
42.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
This is completely wrong. Codex 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 don't have any of these issues. They will regularly tell you that you're wrong if you bother to ask them and they will explain why and what a better solution is. They don&#
43.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
I've been using Codex and Claude Sonnet for many months now for personal (Codex) and work (Sonnet) and I agree. Three months ago these tools were highly usable, now with Codex 5.2 and Sonnet 4.5 I think we're at the point where yo
44.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Eh conda was already doing all this stuff and its shipped in a self extracting .sh file and written largely in Python itself (at least it used to be lol)
45.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
Imagine telling 60 different people "you're wrong and I'm right" without realizing that it's actually you who is wrong
46.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
"not realistic"? Lmao tell me you've never used Python without telling me you've never used Python. This kind of situation is so ubiquitous they've even got an xkcd comic for it https://xkcd.com/1987
47.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
This is why I ditched Python years ago for Go. I cross-compile my program binary to every OS + CPU combination then just curl the binary to the server and run it. Done. Life is much better. I encourage others to do the same. Python is a was
48.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
This is why you DON'T write system tools in Python in the first place. Use a real language that compiles to a native self contained binary that doesn't need dependency installing. Or you use a container. This has been a solved pro
49.
▲
by
dent9
9mo ago
> I still genuinely do not understand why this is a serious selling point. Linux systems commonly already provide (and heavily depend upon) a Python distribution Sounds like you've never actually used Python. You should never, ever
50.
▲
by
dent9
10mo ago
> I understand why Go exists. But I can't think of any reason I'd ever use it. When you want your project to be able to cross-compile down to a static binary that the end user can simply download and run without any "insta
51.
▲
by
dent9
10mo ago
Python succeeded because in the ages before LLM you had to be able to learn a language in order to use it and Python was easy to learn and use for beginners and for experienced devs who were too tired to use a more complex language
52.
▲
by
dent9
10mo ago
This might be the stupidest comment I've ever read on HN. There's not a single case where using Perl is the right call. As others have joked it's a "write only"language. The garbage you write in Perl is illegible to
53.
▲
by
dent9
10mo ago
Agentic AI is a pretty huge scam. Every organization worth it's salt has so many IAM protections in place that an AI developer is useless because you can't give it SSO and OIDC credentials to access the company resources. And no I
54.
▲
by
dent9
10mo ago
Lol that's like saying that because you found the solution on stack overflow you didn't write the program News flash buddy: YOU never wrote any code yourself either. Literally every single line of code you've ever committed t
55.
▲
by
dent9
11mo ago
All the users in the comments here complaining about API limits and usage limits have missed the boat. You're not the target audience. This AI is not for you. It's not for consumers and end users. This AI is for the multi-billion
56.
▲
by
dent9
1y ago
You've got this wrong my friend. You don't use Wi-Fi on a router. You get a separate Wi-Fi Access Point device for that. I use a fanless Intel N100 2.5Gb x4 port system from AliExpress as the router with OpnSense and a Ubiquity Wi
57.
▲
by
dent9
1y ago
The lack of a native simple image editor does indeed suck. I've been using Paintbrush for years and it's good enough https://paintbrush.sourceforge.io/
58.
▲
by
dent9
1y ago
Stop using multiple desktops. Use a single extended desktop. Move the apps where you want them and snap them to one side or the other to any given screen. Done.
59.
▲
by
dent9
1y ago
Stop using "full screen mode", with recent macOS you can just drag the window to the top of the screen and let it "snap" to fit the entire screen. This is different from "full screen mode" which is largely usel
60.
▲
by
dent9
1y ago
You need to use CMD + ` instead of CMD + Tab
More ›