dennisgorelik

193 ms·

1831.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Good tips, but they are definitely not sufficient to make $20 Billion :-)
1832.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
1) It's OK to somewhat forgive the criminals [after their punishment is served], but it's NOT OK to forget about it. 2) Restricting freedom of speech without overwhelming reasons to do so -- is not a good idea. 3) If German courts are going
1833.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
They didn't show how they are going to save edited image.
1834.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
That's a very strong Libertarian case. Government spending must be cut very significantly.
1835.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Not very practical. If we want to avoid carrying key with us, then fingerprint lock would be more convenient and secure.
1836.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Exactly. Blank screen is the best choice -- no distraction.
1837.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Why is that a problem that Google knows about you? Google knows about me a lot, and I think it's a good thing, because: 1) I might be found by relevant people. 2) It adds up to my reputation, for example it may help to send email and have i
1838.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Why does it require installation? Do they know that YouTube is available for years already?
1839.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Are you "that" friend? What are the chances?
1840.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
I wonder if Google would replace management of Google Groups team...
1841.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
It's not Google's business to resolve territorial disputes, so Google's decision to show 3 version of maps is a smart choice. Especially considering how sensitive it's for many people who comment about that issue. We should all learn from G
1842.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
I scored 6. It seems I'm not into MathMo that much. What does it measure anyway?
1843.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
You are almost right: Merchants that readily deliver goods to wherever carders (credit card scammers) ask them to -- go out of business. Ultimately it's merchant's responsibility to make sure credit card is legitimate.
1844.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
I have a better idea: what if it costs 1 cent? That would generate no revenue, but harass posters enough so CraigsList would quickly go out of business.
1845.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
The sale should be done if it is mutually beneficial. For example, if the buyer has skills or technology to scale the business up faster than original founder -- then the price might be set in such a way that it would be better for both buy
1846.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Not really. Whole economy is moving into computers and internet. That means that Information Technology would be in a huge demand. Still that doesn't mean that being in IT guarantees pay off. It's just that there are plenty of amazing oppor
1847.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
What bad things could possibly happen if you start this relationship?
1848.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
I don't see how you came up with the conclusion about investing into cryonics. If person A offered me blue pill for $1000 and I refused [because I don't see any proof] -- does it mean that I have to accept next offer for the red pill [which
1849.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Why do you think that pouring half a billion dollars into anti-aging research would give a good chance of accomplishing something in that field? Spending tons of money guarantees only one thing -- spending money. If there were promising res
1850.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
The comments are better than the original article :-)
1851.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
Sorry, but cryonics is a scam. The chances of extending life using cryonics are so low, that any investment into cryonics would decrease you current quality of life, not improve it [by extending your life into future]. http://aidevelopment
1852.
by dennisgorelik 17y ago
> Why aren't these rich people throwing money at SENS research? Because at this moment science is very far from solving human aging problem, and significant investments wouldn't likely help much.
1853.
by dennisgorelik 18y ago
These 419 scammers operate in the culture that is very tolerant to scammers. That's another reason why they chose such a bad line of business. BTW, I don't think scammers are making big $$$. Scam doesn't pay well in long term.