deng

7 ms·

61.
by deng 8mo ago
This is just half of what Time Machine does. What people are constantly missing is that Apple Time Machine is fast , as it does not need to walk through the whole filesystem to find changed files. Thanks to FSEvents, introduced in Mac OS X
62.
by deng 9mo ago
From the fine article: Why shell? Well, not really because it’s portable, as despite being a “POSIX script”, most of the date and sed tricks I do don’t work on the BSD versions of those commands, with comrak, additionally, being a dependenc
63.
by deng 9mo ago
Indeed, the Gas-Town token is down 97% from all-time high, see https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gas-town/ He's obviously a smart guy, so he definitely should've known better. It's weird how thes
64.
by deng 9mo ago
> you can't really point at an RFC and say it settles an argument This is pretty much the opposite of what I'm doing. I'm saying: look at that RFC, where they write that NAT filters incoming traffic! If even people writing
65.
by deng 9mo ago
I can only repeat myself: you are talking about the NAT module in the Linux netfilter. I, and the RFC, are talking about NAT as a concept: what behavior do you expect when you say "this device does NAT". Of course you can still ha
66.
by deng 9mo ago
> That whole section is talking about outbound connections Erm... no? Immediately after the paragraph you cited, it continues with The key behavior to describe is what criteria are used by the NAT to filter packets originating fr
67.
Gas-Town crypto token down 98% from all-time high(coinmarketcap.com)
3 points by deng 9mo ago|0 comments
68.
by deng 9mo ago
The problem is: what is an implementation detail, and what is NAT as a concept? This line is very blurry. The RFC does not really distinguish this and also doesn't want to. As it says, it tries to document behavior and explicitly uses
69.
by deng 9mo ago
Before you engage in discussions, may I suggest to look into RFC 4787, especially section 5 about filtering behaviors of NAT: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4787#section-5 Several things can be correct a
70.
by deng 9mo ago
No
71.
by deng 9mo ago
UPnP is not tied to NAT, where do you have this from? UPnP is used to request direct connections, a firewall can implement UPnP just as well as a NAT.
72.
by deng 9mo ago
It's scary how many supposed hackers have never even looked up an RFC before making grandiose statements. There is such a thing as "NAT filtering", see RFC 4787, section 5: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc&#x2
73.
by deng 9mo ago
'Baba is you' is one of the greatest puzzle games ever. The sheer amount of levels and variations is just staggering, although I must say that it absolutely does become quite frustrating at the end, and you can see from achievemen
74.
by deng 9mo ago
If you look at the original Cursor post, they say they are currently running similar experiments, for instance, this Excel clone: https://github.com/wilson-anysphere/formula The Actions overview is impressive: There ha
75.
by deng 9mo ago
Even then, "resolving merge conflicts along the way" doesn't mean anything, as there are two trivial merge strategies that are always guaranteed to work ('ours' and 'theirs').
76.
by deng 9mo ago
You seem to think I'm an AI coding hater or something. I'm not. I think these tools are incredibly useful and I use them daily. However, like described in the article, I do am skeptical about stories where AI writes whole applicat
77.
by deng 9mo ago
No. The main reasons are that 1) the code AI produces is full of problems, and if you show it, people will make fun of you, or 2) if you actually run the code as a service people can use, you'll immediately get hacked by people to prov
78.
by deng 9mo ago
> I hope my snarky joke wasn't too annoying Don't worry, he always writes like this.
79.
by deng 9mo ago
> there is no way bandcamp could enforce a strict "non AI has been used in the process" policy Good thing that's not what Bandcamp is doing, then. To spare you a click, here's the exact wording: "Music and audio
80.
by deng 9mo ago
Erm... things are a bit more complicated than you make them out to be and I'm afraid you do not really know a lot about how all of this works (me neither, btw, this is all very, very messy). It is correct that Spotify pays artists thro
81.
by deng 9mo ago
> Even if its just creative prompting, or perhaps custom trained models, someday someone will come along and make a genuine artistic viable piece of work using ai. We've now had this technology for 2 years. Show me one, just ONE tra
82.
by deng 9mo ago
There was no "demonization" about these things even remotely comparable to what we are witnessing now w.r.t. AI generated music (and I'm old enough to remember most of these things). Of course there was intense dislike from c
83.
by deng 9mo ago
> I'm a musician, but am also pretty amused by this anti ai wave. Let me guess: you're an amateur musician. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it makes it much easier to be amused about this topic. > There w
84.
by deng 9mo ago
Yeah, it's just one of those, but worse. It's basically run by a bunch of badly written bash scripts: https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/a-word-on-omarchy/
85.
by deng 9mo ago
Can confirm everything. PLA is completely unusable for this as it quickly deforms under constant pressure, so it is impossible to have a stable press fit with it. ABS would be the obvious choice (since Lego is ABS), but it's difficult
86.
by deng 9mo ago
No sure what exactly you mean by "off-brand", but I have recently bought big sets from Mould King and Cada and they are perfectly fine. Not only are they cheap, I'd say the color consistency is even a bit better. The sets the
87.
by deng 9mo ago
And again, yes, by the original definition of NAT in RFC1631, you are technically correct, which as we all know is the best kind of correctness and will move things forward. However, here in the real world, practically all NAT implementatio
88.
by deng 9mo ago
> No, the side effect of NAT is that outbound connections made from your network look like they come from the router's WAN IP. That's the primary function of NAT, not a side effect. > It doesn't filter incoming traffic.
89.
by deng 9mo ago
> NAT per se does not prevent an outside host from connecting to a host on your local network. Yep, and a firewall per se does not prevent an outside host from connecting to a host on your local network. You can bang your head all day lo
90.
by deng 9mo ago
Not really, privacy extensions are usually on by default, at least on Windows and Linux. This means temporary ipv6 addresses will be used for outbound traffic and rotated regularly (usually every 24h by default, if I'm not mistaken). A

More ›