demi56

7 ms·

31.
by demi56 3y ago
You could say the same for most languages
32.
by demi56 3y ago
You’re loading your ideas of other languages into Go and with this current Go team that’s wishful features
33.
by demi56 3y ago
Some of these proposals don’t work especially for Go, Go type system is so plain infact it’s too plain that allowing for “special compiler keywords” can do more harm than good, example is “?” What if there’re 4 return values?, in Go where O
34.
by demi56 3y ago
Depends on the person who sees such as imperfections, not every perfection is the right one. The wise take should be “is it the right one”
35.
by demi56 3y ago
Wow, so c++ is joining the gang too, looks like rust really is changing the programming ecosystem
36.
by demi56 3y ago
Rust has No specified category when it comes to development, with the number of libraries with macros infested I could write rust and still get the same knowledge I would have gotten in languages like Go or Java
37.
by demi56 3y ago
Honestly I see no reason why rust is so focused on Async if they’re C++ alternative (that is smaller runtime), having a unique keyword doesn’t seat right with me, I won’t be surprised if there will one day be a popular GC runtime
38.
by demi56 3y ago
I wouldn’t call that “stand out” especially when it comes to game engines, game engines are very complex and they are all different from implementations to their algorithms having a native thread management keyword does more worries than st
39.
by demi56 3y ago
This kind of benchmarks will always be unfair, from implementation to libraries to compilation and in other to know why certain perform such way one have to know the core of the language
40.
by demi56 3y ago
This is kinda small compared to other proposals
41.
by demi56 3y ago
Because GitHub is a mirror not the actual repo, I think I was around 2015 when Go was gaining massive attraction they had to use GitHub for issues also, still you can’t change the fact that more than 70% of commits is from google
42.
by demi56 3y ago
I get where this is coming from, sometimes I hate it when it comes to Not writing network services or servers in Go, it’s just pure dislike I would love it if there a way we can have a plugin-able runtime since the runtime is viewed as a li
43.
by demi56 3y ago
Thanks for the info
44.
by demi56 3y ago
No F# ?
45.
by demi56 3y ago
So what’s gonna happen for v1 and v2 ? cause the number of features you’re offering in v3 is gonna be difficult to maintain compared to v1, v2