Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
demarq
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
In real life countries can have sovereignty. In cyberspace only individuals can have sovereignty. Otherwise you’re just choosing who misuses their privilege to your data.
32.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Here is the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17033
33.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
I don’t buy it. It’s like a simple if statement. If Israel || Gaza || Nyetawhaterver then canFlag = false. It has happened so so so many times, it’s naive at this point to believe the mod has no influence It’s ridiculous that the biggest st
34.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
I see, here is the line > As such, it is a relevant question to ask.
35.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
You’re not being trolled. I’m asking you a genuine question, but because you feel strongly on the subject and assume the we all see things the same way, you feel that there’s malice involved when someone appears on the radar and says hey I
36.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
How is it fairly obvious, and why does it invoke such an emotional response?
37.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Same, I felt like I was writing my own auth. They don’t seem to understand that we’re trying to get away from the complexity of auth. I’ve talked with their sales people but may as well be talking to a wall.
38.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
I was replying to claims of footage
39.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Where
40.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Yup and impossible to verify, you can wake up and claim drones were sighted and that’s that.
41.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Just remember there were rumors of Sony also giving up their console all together. The money is in services and IP, you don’t want to restrict yourself to one piece of hardware. They need you to grab their next titles more than they need yo
42.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
I feel for you OP. Everyone on here clearly aware that they have no influence over their own government seem to instantly lack empathy for your situation because they saw the word Iran. It’s all pretty moronic if I’m honest. I really hope t
43.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Controversial take here. Sue your customer. No really. Banks operate on risk, make chargebacks risky. Some of these chargebacks sound like straight up fraud. Three months of usage and using their bank to reverse a payment. Make Fraud Spicy
44.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
> round people who were good with their hands, but in my mind buying a used car isn't a scary matter - you visit the private seller, you look at the vehicle, you check for the things one needs to check for, and you know if it has pr
45.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Proton does not do anything it says in the tin. Just a warning
46.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
This is just a phrase repeated 3 times in a page?
47.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
things that you think sound good, might not sound good to the authority in charge of determining what is good. For example using your LLM to criticise, ask questions or perform civil work that is deemed undesirable becomes evil. You can u
48.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Is this an ad to win defence contracts?
49.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
> Allegations emerge that the company posted fake reviews and used logos of clients it hadn’t actually served. Every start up on HN ever
50.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
What are you replying to
51.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Big assumption here, is that developers don’t spend time fixing their own work or other developers work. I feel the benchmark is some engineer who shoots out perfect work the first time they hit the keyboard.
52.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Same, I thought the free accounts were always trained on. Which in my opinion is reasonable since you could delete the data you didn’t want to keep on the service. But including paid accounts and doing 5 year retention however is confoundin
53.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
What will any provider get out of running free inference then?
54.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
I’m proposing this, the ability to mark certain chats as non trainable. Like an incognito mode. If a chat is not marked as that after 5 days it can be retained for training. And this is only for free users, paid users should never have to t
55.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Are you sure the opt out isn’t only training? The retention does not seem affected by the toggle.
56.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
One has next to no consequences or oversight
57.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
It’s more that five years worth of peoples most personal conversations is an absolute treasure trove and makes their systems much more inviting for hackers and yes governments. The part that irks me is that this includes people who are lite
58.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
Also your chats will now be stored for 5 years.
59.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
poverty
60.
▲
by
demarq
1y ago
There is a spring and some sort of latch You can see it off to the side in this post https://www.reddit.com/r/Trackballs/comments/u0f9kn/smooth_s... But know that it won't make the onscreen scroll s
More ›