Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
delroth
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
271.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
> They can't really be blamed for a DOS attack. That doesn't really hold when their competitors have teams of engineers working on DDoS mitigations and successfully handle most of these attacks. Falling to a DoS is a technical
272.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
A few points I can think of: * It's more mature than many other emulation projects. Work started in 2003, and it has been open sourced 8 years ago. * From the beginning there were a few people with strong software engineering backgroun
273.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
That's because OpenEmu is not an emulator. It's just a UI for the work of other people.
274.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
> Same for the GPU - they keep using pretty much the same Radeon, just newer, faster, etc. The GPUs of the GameCube and the Wii have nothing to do with Radeon GPUs. They were designed by ArtX before they got bought by ATI (now AMD). >
275.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
50% less than SV in Zürich? You're greatly mistaken. Last I checked I'm paid more here than what I would get if I were to do the same job in Mountain View.
276.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
Google secured 5 new buildings in a very nice location in Zürich at the end of 2014: http://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/google-zieht-an-die-europaallee-1.... This article says this is enough space for 5000 more employees.
277.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
> If you are smart, you can build a core of your business and then let yourself be acquihired by the big players if you wish to, why bother with employment at Google unless it's your first job outside university? Because if you care
278.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
One notable thing here is that even if the proportions are the same, in the end the absolute amount of money you are putting in your savings every month is higher. Or, in other words, if you're going in vacation in a less expensive cou
279.
▲
Hacking and upgrading the Korg Kronos
(marcan.st)
2 points
by
delroth
10y ago
|
0 comments
280.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
The first Pixel was released in 2013.
281.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
Unless you also disable execution of Javascript on all the devices that connect to your network (including your phones, set-top boxes, etc.), these devices can be used to attack your router from the LAN. Just use Javascript to autosubmit a
282.
▲
by
delroth
10y ago
> CloudFlare's firewall system uses LuaJIT to analyse approximately 4 million GET requests per second. While I agree with your premise (LuaJIT is a pretty awesome project), this example means nothing in terms of performance. — "
283.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Indeed, something like "sudo ip netns exec myvpn sudo -u delroth -- google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir=~/.config/myvpn-google-chrome"
284.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
On Linux I configure a network namespace that routes everything through my VPN, and I run a separate Chrome profile within that namespace (or whatever else I want to run and route through the VPN). http://pastie.org/private&
285.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
You are projecting your own opinions and representing them as "the will of the people". I personally vastly prefer things in life being amusing and unexpected rather than boring and pompous, and as such I think "Boaty McBoatf
286.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Only in the US. :(
287.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
(Usual disclaimer: I speak for myself, not for my employer, etc.) The team in charge of solving this particular problem is located in two sites in two different timezones. This is true of most critical SRE teams at Google, and it is precise
288.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
I had the same feeling when reading this article. That's nothing like "high performance", especially the 5ms median latency. memcached is a whole two orders of magnitude lower in terms of median latency.
289.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
The example is using multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool which does not have the GIL problem you mention (at the cost of making it harder to share data).
290.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Please read the link I posted before replying. Mike Hearn explains that the biggest advantage that large email service providers in the war against spam is their centralized aspect. Because of the access to large amounts of data (obviously)
291.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
It's not (only?) a question of "gaining value". End-to-end encryption is fundamentally incompatible with many features that Gmail users rely on. I would recommend reading https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive&
292.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
That's not really "little known". Almost every single piece of code that does string manipulation in C uses that fact: const char* s = ...; while (*s++) { ... }
293.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Just because you can never get full coverage doesn't mean it has to be easy. For example, here are some things that could be imlpemented to make firmware backdooring harder: * Certificate Transparency-style public ledger for all firmwa
294.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Except that there is no proof of this. It was stated as false by John Kelley, an ex Embedded Security engineer at Apple: https://twitter.com/JohnHedge/status/699882614212075520 For all we know so far, Apple could
295.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Maybe that would force manufacturers to be in a position where they can truthfully say "we can't do that". I'd prefer that to the current situation where Apple basically has a backdoor they're just trying to keep fo
296.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
The FBI explicitly requested a firmware image that is bound to a specific device (by checking a unique ID -- read the court order please). That signed image would not be usable on other devices without going through Apple again.
297.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Note that EA had already released some of the code in 2010: https://github.com/paulhodge/EASTL
298.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
I recently switched our large-ish GitHub project to use reviewable.io for code reviews. The UI can be hard to understand sometimes, but so far everyone agrees it's a tremendous improvement over GitHub's joke of a code review UI.
299.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
Secure Boot's aim is mostly to protect against malware persisting through the boot process ("bootkits"). Given that it's anchored in the firmware and the firmware is unverified in almost all consumer x86 motherboards, an
300.
▲
by
delroth
11y ago
If you're not using TXT, your full disk encryption is completely useless if an attacker can get access to your laptop for 5 minutes¹. They can just backdoor the bootloader (or, on Linux, your kernel/initramfs which are not encrypt
More ›