deletes

14 ms·

31.
by deletes 13y ago
Not, years, months; assuming a couple of decent comments per day, with a couple of points per answer( my definition of a couple is ~ 2-4 here ).
32.
by deletes 13y ago
It would spend all it's time and resources in order to even slightly decrease the probability of a human coming to harm. You are assuming there are no thresholds, which is not correct for any decent ( fictitious )ai, I believe.
33.
by deletes 13y ago
I should have specified I mean only the Robot trilogy. I have yet to read every book.
34.
by deletes 13y ago
In the books the robots adhered to the laws strictly. The problem was that humans were able to circumvent the laws rather easily. For example; lie to the robot or divide the murder trough many robots each unaware of each other. In absence o
35.
by deletes 13y ago
* Zeroth Law: A robot must never harm humanity or, by inaction allow humanity to come to harm. Every other law gets an unless this interferes with the zeroth law. suffix. I encourage anyone to read the robots series, specifically(
36.
by deletes 13y ago
The 2^53 is missing.
37.
by deletes 13y ago
Looks like the internal state of the numbers that actually decide what can be merged is changed when you press a key. Also works if you hold it down, which is a bug I think. Just hold down one direction to observe.
38.
by deletes 13y ago
Are the collisions at least plausible?
39.
by deletes 13y ago
What if John Carmack is an average programmer, and the rest of us are just lazy in comparison.
40.
by deletes 13y ago
Why then don't geniuses come from third world countries. Improved standard of living will help that, not pure numbers.
41.
by deletes 13y ago
That is a bad analogy. Unlike software, building take time, people and material resources to build and cost magnitudes more, yet windows can be installed/upgraded in an hour. Microsoft already issued a patch( not that they didn't
42.
by deletes 13y ago
I can think of Kindle as a physical device that comes with ads until you pay more money. Surely there is potential in this approach for other home appliances.
43.
by deletes 13y ago
A common misconception. Ha, try finding that one...
44.
by deletes 13y ago
I would say you are a victim of the overly dramatic article, designed to attract clicks.
45.
by deletes 13y ago
Sounds implausible. It is more probable that he inhaled it and didn't realize or is ashamed to admit it. http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/article.aspx?articl... http://tywkiwdbi.blogspot.com/200
46.
by deletes 13y ago
I didn't think about it so literally. I understood it more as a methaphor/explanation for life and meaning of life.
47.
by deletes 13y ago
The correct answer. Life is a continuous process.
48.
by deletes 13y ago
Here is one way: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvBOUy9E5Qw&feature=youtu.be&... Don't watch if you are emotionally attached to pc hardware.
49.
by deletes 13y ago
When I first read Ubik I though their economy is unrealistic. How do the appliances and doors that charge for usage make sense? It makes an interesting replacement for the warranty in the item contract. Pay the toll, and the item is kept co
50.
by deletes 13y ago
The devs at Sony really like the matrix. Not very subtle.
51.
by deletes 13y ago
Oculus Rift FOV is 110°.
52.
by deletes 13y ago
60 Virtual speakers What does that even mean? It sounds like clever marketing talk. I bet they have just regular stereo and software. Here, take a pair of good stereo headphones and try this 3d demo. And don't forget to close your ey
53.
by deletes 13y ago
You didn't do a lot of mashing keys right. This version really takes some thought.
54.
by deletes 13y ago
Undoubtfully the number is really large, but I'm not sure what exactly you mean by cube Planck lengths. A comparison to atoms would be more clear. Still, it wouldn't have to. Since most arrays would have pieces with lower numbers
55.
by deletes 13y ago
edit: Looks ok, I'm confused :) It is interesting. The best way to solve it is to forget about dimensions and just learn the rules of what key does what in terms of piece movement.
56.
by deletes 13y ago
So 2048 in 2048 dimensions after that?
57.
by deletes 13y ago
Yes but not always. A pre-filled version would likely be made for commercial release.
58.
by deletes 13y ago
Yet it can't be solved by mashing and requires some thought.
59.
by deletes 13y ago
Not really, you can fake both.
60.
by deletes 13y ago
This is the best version of the game. --- There needs to be a clear while line separating the boxes; after intense staring I have difficulty separating the individual boxes. A "solution": keep pressing right and E and up or down i

More ›