Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
delecti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
421.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I agree with your point, but lets not get ahead of ourselves; it's currently only an attempted assassination.
422.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
XCancel link which will show the thread context if you aren't logged in to Twitter: https://xcancel.com/grapheneos/status/1964561043906048183
423.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
How do you say it though? "Eye Dee Dot Polo"? "Id Polo"? It looks fine given that explanation, but it also needs to be words that people can speak.
424.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
It also shifted a bunch over the course of the protests. After the middle fingers, they moved to porn (mass posting and upvoting clear TOS violations), and then just blackout posts (posting and upvoting solid black images). Somewhere in the
425.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
> I think it's clear that nobody agrees what AGI is People selling AI products are incentivized to push misleading definitions of AGI.
426.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Defamation does not have to be intentional, it can also be a statement made with reckless disregard for whether it's true or not. That's a pretty solid description of LLM hallucinations.
427.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
A lot of us are also autistic, and I suspect there's a sizable overlap with the people who like to be right. Though as someone in that overlap, it's less "I want to be the one who brings correctness" and more "I wan
428.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
It's quite a bit different from that description, but Diaspora by Greg Egan deals with some impressive scales of time and space. The tone is nothing like you're describing, but the ideas and scale in it totally changed how I think
429.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Humans are the only species in the known* universe to have deliberately left their home planet. We may not be fully capable of it, but we are indeed more capable of transcending extinction than any other known species. * - which is cert
430.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
You can accept that they're fundamentally batshit insane and also be surprised upon learning about a specific new kind of batshit insanity. And also, letting new batshit insane things slide is just complying in advance. If we're e
431.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Yeah, if anything I think that people alarmed about climate change tend to skew left, and left-leaning people also tend to feel that the government should do more, in general. "This is a problem and we should ignore it" is the opp
432.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Most of the big LLMs have those restrictions, but not all.
433.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Assuming your quote isn't a joke, I think those links prove the opposite. Not only is it unprofessional, courts have found it impermissible.
434.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I'm not going to defend paper straws; plastic straws weren't banned because they're better or worse, they're banned because of a viral video of a sea turtle with one stuck up its nose. LED bulbs are absolutely better tho
435.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Is this meant to be a straw man or a steel man of that position? The idea of preemptively banning something so it can't become better than the status quo seems ludicrous.
436.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I don't think it refutes your point that supply chain dependence is a tactical weakness, but sanctions weren't effective on Russia because half the world is still buying their oil.
437.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
That's a good point. Saying you like the red "colorway" would make it clear that you're talking about the overall presentation, rather than commenting only on the red part of the overall product.
438.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
LLMs would be just as terrible at that usecase as any other kind of therapy. They don't have logic, and can't determine a logical thought from an illogical one. They tend to be overly agreeable, so they might just reinforce existi
439.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I recently switched to an AMOLED Garmin from a watch with an always-on screen (and before that, a pebble), so maybe I can weigh in. The use-case for a transflective watch are the same as they were in 2013. I don't really care if my wat
440.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I hear it all the time in reviews or discussions of tech products. I don't think it really means anything other than "color" or "color scheme", it's just a more product focused way of talking about it.
441.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
We don't see the blood in veins, and it wouldn't be blue if we could, but I would agree that veins are blue.
442.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Human eyes aren't pigmented blue, but they are still blue.
443.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Oh that's nifty. Spotting base64 encoded strings is easy enough (and easy enough to test that I give it a shot if I'm even vaguely curious), but I'd never looked at them closely enough to spot patterns.
444.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I don't think that rule matters here, because the car in question (in phkahler's comment) is stationary.
445.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Microsoft's overall value was also much more tied to their performance in the desktop market. The whole company can grow at 60% yoy if 60% of the company doubles in value. AI is not bringing them any revenue, and double nothing is stil
446.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I think this might be a disconnect between what those lights are "really" for, and how they're actually used (de jure vs de facto, in a sense). They aren't meant to have a specific meaning, they're just headlights,
447.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Mattermost can truly mute. Doing so disables the behavior that makes the channel name bold when there are unread messages. Just hover on a channel name, click the three dots, then "Mute".
448.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
I agree. If Tesla was not allowed to give their product a misleading name, it probably would get fewer sales. That's the rationale behind false advertising laws.
449.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
Isn't that a good thing? The fact that the candidate dumped out code that they didn't write is often called "cheating". The fact that candidates can't explain it (because they didn't write it) means it's a
450.
▲
by
delecti
1y ago
The #metoo movement was in response to decades (centuries? millennia?) of abuse being basically unaddressable. It's totally fair to call it an overcorrection, but a correction was still needed. Are abusive accusations okay? Of course n
More ›