delazeur

24 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   Some people seem the think that the gluten that gets added to store-bought bread is an artificial chemical made in a laboratory. This shows that it is quite natural.
2. 212.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   Lots of people still believe that, even if it's a less popular opinion in a lot of tech hubs.
3. 213.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   I am in a similar situation and it's usually just fine, but it becomes difficult on days when I would be better off sacrificing that "me time" to do something else (chores, errands, family obligations, etc.). When that happe
4. 214.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   The bit that remains is more protein that starch. This is a great demonstration that you can produce raw gluten in your kitchen, and it's handy for when people start spouting pseudo-science about chemicals in their food.
5. 215.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   I paid somewhere between $1,200 and $1,400 per month to share 180 square feet with one other person, and I was lucky not to be sharing with two other people. I could never prove it, but I strongly suspect either the university or their con
6. 216.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   > Anyone saying these kids or their parents should've known better need to get real. Most of the middle and lower class was hustled. This may well be true in the general case (and by extension, in the majority of individual cases),
7. 217.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   Here's a recent example case: A judge recently dismissed a defamation suit against Bill Cosby on the grounds that he has a First Amendment right to deny accusations against him. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news&#x2F
8. 218.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   Even if there were no verifiable astronomical records during the period in question, wouldn't there still be discrepancies related to events from before that period?
9. 219.▲
   by delazeur 11y ago

   > If it detects 9.8g suddenly going to 0g then it parks the read head as it's probably just been dropped. 9.8g? Is your office inside a centrifuge? :-P
10. 220.▲
    by delazeur 11y ago

    Well, I guess that's what I get for believing my first Google hit for "insure vs. ensure." Nonetheless, I see a lot of highly literate people using "insure" for all cases.
11. 221.▲
    by delazeur 11y ago

    While I agree with you about the difference between "insure" and "ensure," that's not a universally accepted grammar rule. I think the may even be in the minority; The New York Times , for example, uses "insu
12. 222.▲
    by delazeur 11y ago

    He certainly put his claim in context, but my suspicion was that "I ended up finishing this 150-year process" was a bit grandiose, so I wanted to see if anyone was familiar with this work. People can definitely be quick to critici
13. 223.▲
    by delazeur 11y ago

    I'm not very familiar with the history of this area, but I've heard repeatedly that Wolfram has a pattern of implicitly or explicitly taking credit for results he wasn't the first person to discover. Can anyone comment on hi