defgeneric

20 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by defgeneric 10y ago

   File listing: tree | xclip -i -sel clip http://pastebin.com/C34b8V8e
2. 182.▲
   by defgeneric 10y ago

   torcache.net doesn't resolve, site seems down. EDIT: working now!
3. 183.▲
   by defgeneric 10y ago

   > A common problem I see in production Lisp code bases is the existence of a programmer's set of pet syntactic abstractions that don't really have a high ceiling; you see all kinds of zaps, frobs, and lets for a reason no other
4. 184.▲
   by defgeneric 10y ago

   There's also Carp: https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp
5. 185.▲
   by defgeneric 11y ago

   yes
6. 186.▲
   by defgeneric 11y ago

   State of the Common Lisp Ecosystem, 2015 http://eudoxia.me/article/common-lisp-sotu-2015
7. 187.▲
   by defgeneric 11y ago

   Urbit is deeply reactionary.
8. 188.▲
   by defgeneric 11y ago

   Yes but can you do caaaaaar or caaddaar or cdaar, etc. with head and tail? In 5 characters with cadar you can express walking along a tree structure to get exactly the node you want.
9. 189.▲
   by defgeneric 11y ago

   It's really such a simple syntax change from f(x) to (f x) yet it makes an enormous difference and opens up a whole new world of possibilities. Sure, there are homoiconic languages in which you can write macros that aren't lisps b
10. 190.▲
    by defgeneric 11y ago

    pgloader (Dimitri Fontaine) is a great piece of software. There's also cl-abnf from the same author and project which is another great example of the expressive power of common lisp. Also, everything Fernando Boretti does is awesome ;)