defaultprimate

9 ms·

91.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Or when you're one of the most coercive lobbying forces on the globe.
92.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
80% of hospitalizations in the US were overweight or obese, the number is even more egregious for under-65 hospitalizations and deaths.
93.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
I'm just holding Bloomberg to the same standards the CDC director holds herself to. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/wave-of-excess-deaths-not... https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f
94.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
[flagged]
95.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
I mean anytime someone whataboutisms literal ongoing genocide, it's bad faith, period. Whether it's someone working directly on behalf of the CCP or an individual self-motivated nationalist or even a foreigner that's fallen f
96.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>Shrug. All evidence is that the Chinese have managed to create plenty of military tech. Stolen IP or not. They really haven't. There's no original R&D. It's just rushed, terrible copies. Yes, there's a massive di
97.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>You mean the country that manufacturers virtually everything Americans buy can’t handle supply chain logistics? Yes, there's a massive difference in military logistics and shipping the latest knock off kitchen appliance via a third
98.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Are you referring to the response to the election results and the years long investigations?
99.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>Haven't there been some recent reports that the U.S. might actually not fare so well against China in direct conflict? By CCP propagandists and agency leaders trying to retain or increase their funding, sure lol. China has nowhere
100.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Search politically controversial topics incognito with a VPN on using google vs yandex vs duckduckgo? Ivermectin, January 6th arrests, BLM protest deaths, VAED, mRNA studies before 2020, Robert Malone, Geert Vanden Bossche. I mean there&#x2
101.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>Why are you so sure of that? Because I understand basic macroeconomics and how prolific and dependent global finance is on the USD.
102.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
This is some Chinese propaganda-esque whataboutism. It's one of the oldest propaganda plays in the book. https://globalvoices.org/2021/08/19/the-chinese-government-d...
103.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
It's something I've stated repeatedly: The most dangerous part of China is not its military or nukes (they're actually hardly an offensive threat at all). It's how effective their global propaganda, cultural warfare, and
104.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>Because USD is a bubble lol no. Do you have any proof of this that's not a crypto blog? >stop using USD as a global reserve currency Not gonna happen.
105.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
It's also possible to have growing economy, increasing inequality, more people entering the middle, upper-middle, and upper class than ever, the poor gaining wealth at the fastest pace on record, and an extremely high quality of life f
106.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
> No regular buyer or seller has the capital to affect the market price in any significant way Which is absolutely not the case in crypto, further evidence of how illiquid it is.
107.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
I've only been rude to the asshole that came out of the gate swinging with accusations of being a conspiracy theorist.
108.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Mate I'm not sure how to make this any clearer to you. Literally none of the examples you gave are in any way comparable to injecting a completely novel medical intervention both in mechanism and function for which zero long term dat
109.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidity.asp >without affecting its market price
110.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>The Covid vaccine is hardly a “completely novel” It really is. Its mechanism of action is completely new and involves cell alterations and inducing protein synthesis that has never been done before and for which no long term data exists
111.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>but your decision making process was not informed by information or probabilities in any way. That's exactly what it is and will be informed by, and that information right now is zero. There's no evidence to support the hypoth
112.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
I'm not sure how you want me to respond to what you stated since it has nothing to do with what I stated. Long term data doesn't exist. There's no evidence the vaccines are safe long term. They also experienced greatly accele
113.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
See my comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29885809 Completely novel direct health interventions are in no way comparable to technological advances built on well understood foundations and methodologies for w
114.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Long term data doesn't exist, period. Newspeak isn't newspeak. Got it.
115.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
The probability of negative outcomes versus the a priori knowledge of outcomes, the context of the novel thing being introduced (direct health interventions versus convenience of cell phones is a great chasm), the similar evidence surroundi
116.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
14 cohorts of 6 individuals were injected between 2013-2016.
117.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
I'm not interested is discussing crypto's made up redefinitions of long standing, well understood financial terms. Crypto is illiquid. It has no intrinsic value.
118.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
The study was conducted in 2018, is the first and only one prior, was uncontrolled, only had 101 participants, a follow up of 64 days, and several negative outcomes. I do stand corrected. One made it to human trials. Doesn't mitigate d
119.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
>Is there some reason why we would expect a priori for the COVID-19 vaccine to have a particularly high risk of adverse affects that only show up long-term? The correct question is, is there sufficient evidence that we shouldn't? Yo
120.
by defaultprimate 5y ago
Heart attack, stroke, and blood clots were massively up among all ages in 2021, even compared to 2020

More ›