deeviant

12 ms·

121.
by deeviant 3y ago
Two Paths: 1. Build a skill set to navigate millions of pages of fluff SEO garbage and gain intuition of which sites are more likely to be credibility based on something akin to a internet dosing rod. 2. Build skill set to evaluate if a sta
122.
by deeviant 3y ago
> I'm saying that average people get banned from subreddits all the time for completely innocuous remarks. I'm am saying my past 14 years on reddit do not confirm your statement. Sure if you go to r/conservative and say so
123.
by deeviant 3y ago
It seems like you just confirmed my original comment. Thanks. If you think the average person that gets banned in a sub is some sort of freedom fighting martyr, then you frankly don't really know much about the subject.
124.
by deeviant 3y ago
Your post really comes off as if you are sore about being banned from some sub.
125.
by deeviant 3y ago
Between Musk and u/spez, I recovered at least 2 hours a day of normally wasted time. I've read books, like actual paper ones. Spent some time making a simply 2-d space shooter, just for fun. Spent more time engaged with people I c
126.
by deeviant 3y ago
A more surprising title would be "You might own the data of your air quality monitor."
127.
by deeviant 3y ago
It seems likely the Real-Time Hull Monitoring didn't turn out to be very useful.
128.
by deeviant 3y ago
I'm guessing that the joke will be on us humans, as the quality of the data goes up as more AI is involved in the labeling process. I don't know how many times humans will make the mistake of placing themselves in the literally or
129.
by deeviant 3y ago
> In that context, this “design pattern” really isn’t a design pattern per se; it’s just a formalism over the code you’d inevitably write to make such a system work. What exactly do you think a design pattern is?
130.
by deeviant 3y ago
This is exactly what I thought when I read the article. Specifically, that it's exactly opposite-of-correct; this is exactly the thing that will push LLMs to the next level. I think the simple idea using chatGPT to filter it's inp
131.
by deeviant 3y ago
> This is false. Stats showed 3rd party app users were an extreme minority of users. We don't seem to agree on the definition of "many". Apollo had 1.5 million users. RIF about the same. That's just two of the biggest
132.
by deeviant 3y ago
I don't see a problem with charging for a product (I feel like this sentiment isn't exactly unique here on HN). Just like I don't see a problem in Reddit charging these 3rd party apps to play ball. But the pricing was not gro
133.
by deeviant 3y ago
One of us doesn't, that's for sure.
134.
by deeviant 3y ago
In a couple weeks, the main way many people use Reddit is going to literally be blocked forever. The alternatives are not palatable to many, so the users are basically being unilaterally banished from Reddit. And that's just the openin
135.
by deeviant 3y ago
I have read through this thread and I have not found a single coherent reason, hence my question. All of the arguments I see here on the other side are assumptions backed by nothing, i.e. "the majority users of subs didn't agree
136.
by deeviant 3y ago
It's crazy the amount of people that seemed to be straining to support Reddit, it's almost, suspicious.
137.
by deeviant 3y ago
> Some of us think that the blackouts are starting to look a lot like a tantrum that doesn't represent the best interests of the community. I've yet to seen a single coherent argument that supports this statement. Please enligh
138.
by deeviant 3y ago
I mod a small sub that I started many years ago, the sub users expressed overwhelming support for the 2 day private protest. So I am interested in what numbers you are using to support your statement that users did not consent.
139.
by deeviant 3y ago
The real problem isn't that Google can't detect what spam is, it's that this spam drives so much of the traffic, and thus their revenue that they cannot remove it. Google at this point is literally teaming up with spammers. J
140.
by deeviant 3y ago
Eh, the thing I feel most people (who lost a lot of money on crypto) learned about what money is, is that crypto is not money.
141.
by deeviant 3y ago
This is literally what Digg did to self-destruct, in that they basically eliminated user powers and created some automatic feed. And, it died literally overnight.
142.
by deeviant 3y ago
FYI, OpenAI has denied that there have been any unannounced changes to the models. And it seems more than possible that people see what they want to see in LLM output. So I would be careful to make completely unsupported claims.
143.
by deeviant 3y ago
Chatgpt is trained on the internet, off which SO is part of it. It's also trained off interactions with it's users, which would eventually take over sources like SO.
144.
by deeviant 3y ago
I have not used SO once since chatgpt 4 came out, not once. I'm sure there are cases there SO has better responses than GPT, but frankly, they are rare, and the ability to query and shape chatGPTs responses basically obsoletes the SO m
145.
by deeviant 3y ago
https://tildes.net/
146.
by deeviant 3y ago
Or, you know, Digg. Digg's demise was literally the birth of Reddit's popularity, but the lesson was seemingly lost on Reddit "leadership".
147.
by deeviant 3y ago
If the 3rd part Apps did find some way to eat the cost, it would basically solve reddit's monetization problem. Redditors could feel good paying 10$/month to their favorite reddit ap developer, and not evil corpo Reddit, and reddi
148.
by deeviant 3y ago
Feels like a /r/IAmTheMainCharacter/ post.
149.
by deeviant 3y ago
Nice, solved that very serious problem there.
150.
by deeviant 3y ago
This is some flat-earther grade logic. Good grief.

More ›