deelowe

8 ms·

91.
by deelowe 2y ago
And a is why they are being pushed so hard. I'm so sick and tired of this. Why is it that every time there's a new piece of tech or something gets updated it's 1) often categorically worse and 2) seems like its designed in su
92.
by deelowe 2y ago
It's worth nothing that while they do eliminate many of the drawbacks with emulation, FGPA solutions are still not 1:1 recreations of consoles.
93.
by deelowe 2y ago
Nvidia says otherwise.
94.
by deelowe 2y ago
Intel is a dividend stock. You can't just look at share price.
95.
by deelowe 2y ago
Dividends primarily.
96.
by deelowe 2y ago
In a nutshell, Intel's board was focused on extracting value from the company instead of innovating. While this was going on, compute was undergoing a transformation as everything transitioned to cloud solutions. By the time they reali
97.
by deelowe 2y ago
Media likes to lump together "farmers" and large ag companies. They are no where near the same.
98.
by deelowe 2y ago
You're going to have serious issues if you take that much. It's causes major problems after a few days.
99.
by deelowe 2y ago
Dextromethorphan is the only otc cough medicine that works and pretty much the only prescription stuff that works is opiate based. Of course both are regulated.
100.
by deelowe 2y ago
You take 48 pills in two weeks?!
101.
by deelowe 2y ago
The opinion that x86 would always be king is nepotism/ego. It was obvious nearly 2 decades ago where compute was headed with cloud and mobile becoming the dominant areas. Neither of which x86 was well positioned for.
102.
by deelowe 2y ago
They killed strongarm because of nepotism. That's been the issue at Intel for decades. They are the epitome of ego over merit and x86 was king.
103.
by deelowe 2y ago
I suspect the engineers at traditional automakers HATE electric vehicles and this is likely causing massive delays. The vast vast majority of those engineers and other technical folks have careers which are are utterly dependent on ICE deve
104.
by deelowe 2y ago
As someone who's intimately familiar with both cultures, I'm convinced Intel would have killed any innovation Nvidia had going for it before it had a chance to really take off. Management at the two could not be more opposite if t
105.
by deelowe 2y ago
Uhuh. And what does that mean exactly?
106.
by deelowe 2y ago
I thought it was so they can name make the booster body thinner relying more on the fuel for structural rigidity.
107.
by deelowe 2y ago
It has not. I have family impacted who still does not have power. One week will be tomorrow.
108.
by deelowe 2y ago
You're probably getting replies like that because it's a bit of an odd question. Academic research isn't really done to achieve a particular purpose or goal. The piratical benefit literally is academic.
109.
by deelowe 2y ago
I read the paper. Superhuman is a metric they defined in the paper which has to do with how long it takes a human to do certain tasks.
110.
by deelowe 2y ago
Well, Microsoft certainly is running into some challenges at this point: https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/microsoft-open-three-... If nothing else, physics starts to become a limiting factor.
111.
by deelowe 2y ago
That's a bit reductionist.
112.
by deelowe 2y ago
I bet Intels hubris is too strong to allow them to do that these days.
113.
by deelowe 2y ago
I mean, it's very likely next gen consoles will feature AI hardware. The PS5 pro is already touting it.
114.
by deelowe 2y ago
Intel didn't take gaming seriously until very recently. They stayed focused on productivity focused applications well past the time when netbooks became viable for most use cases.
115.
by deelowe 2y ago
Having recently switched jobs, I was again reminded of just how terrible most interviewers are. The more senior the interviewer, the more terrible.
116.
by deelowe 2y ago
I grew up in a very religious and rural community. I get sleep paralysis fairly often these days but the first time I recall getting it was in my early teens. My parents thought the devil was trying to possess me. Fun.
117.
by deelowe 2y ago
Yep. The business case for cloud solutions is TTM, availability and capacity. The argument that on prem never delivered on its promise to be cheaper is a lie by omission. It CAN be cheaper, but that was never the main reason.
118.
by deelowe 2y ago
I think it's more because individual pc instances literally doesn't matter anymore. Operating systems and programming languages which lock you into them are irrelevant from a revenue standpoint.
119.
by deelowe 2y ago
Microsoft as a company is extremely myopic. Budgets are scrutinized down to the penny every few months at very senior levels. This drives a culture of immediacy. Wine was a threat until Microsoft realized everyone in tech had moved to servi
120.
by deelowe 2y ago
Oh there's plenty of ux but it's all focused on dark patterns at this point.

More ›