Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
decebalus1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_J._Trump_Presidential_L... It's not built yet, but rumors are that it's gonna be inside a McDonald's franchise. It's going to be called the McDonald Trump P
32.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
The mental gymnastics to defend Trump are astonishing. But sure, Obama had classified documents (bullshit, btw). While Trump was in the White House and republicans held both chambers of Congress. Why wasn't this investigated? Was the T
33.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
> investigated for crimes not committed How do you know? Are you part of the investigation?
34.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
The time I used vert.x in my day job was by far the best Java experience in my career. Completely different language. And the vert.x maintainers have been all around great wrt to responding to issues and/or accepting contributions. Gre
35.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
The term RINO has a distinct fascist flavor and I would avoid using it. It pretty much dismisses any disagreement from the groupthink.
36.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
> but for the sake of the nation It honestly does not matter at this point. Remember when Trump said “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters"? Still holds up today and he's not e
37.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Probably (not a legal scholar) but I'm sure it applies to sitting presidents, not former presidents.
38.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Reason #1 - I agree Reason #2 - Nobody disagrees with this. The robots would probably clean better Non-Reason #1 - There's a lot more information than the layout of the home which can be gathered by these robots. The layout of the home
39.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
I've been doing on-call for more than a decade and I feel I need to offer my perspective here. I worked in teams in which I would never get paged and also teams in which I'd get 100 alerts per week. > But why? Why do you think
40.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
If you have the time, listen to this https://www.thisamericanlife.org/670/beware-the-jabberwock It's really well produced and informative.
41.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
That's a false equivalence. The court mediates the case between private parties. That's what civil court does. This is not a trial between 'the people' (the State) and Alex Jones. It's between some of the parents of
42.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Why..? > The only radar-guided missiles that Ukraine currently has in its possession are U.S.-made RGM-84 Harpoon and locally-produced Neptune anti-ship missiles, which are not really designed for land attack applications. I guess they&#
43.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Yet another episode of Ukraine not letting itself be invaded 'the right way'. Remember kids, your town/city should already have fortifications and one on three buildings should be actually military in nature, so that when the
44.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
But how would that motivate the other CEOs or aspiring CEOs to be better CEOs? /s
45.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Is anyone else bothered by the gratuitous and wrong usage of 'bullshit'? English is not my mother tongue but bullshit would refer to a lie (horseshit would express disbelief, chickenshit - cowardice, dogshit - awful, etc..) while
46.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Precisely! Also, as Kevin from The Office brilliantly put it, “Why waste time say lot word, when few word do trick?” "'Aforementioned' drives nuts. It pompous; it redundant. “The aforementioned usage is …” becomes “The usage
47.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
> The only legitimate usage of “the aforementioned” is to put it into the mouth of a character who you want to sound pompous. https://paperstack.com/project_fear/ > Here is the précis of a project for a vast mult
48.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
> the success of the world Which part of the world is succeeding? What does that actually mean? 'Success of the world' is such an empty statement. What did it succeed at? Destroying our habitat? > does not mean we shouldn&#x
49.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
It's funny because that's what I was intending. But then I realized I'm too lazy to mix stuff and just started vaping straight 6mg nicotine base.
50.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
The thread scares me, as it confirms some of my own feelings for the past year or so. To see it written down by strangers is just.. eerie
51.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
This should be a non-issue right now. See the study is from 2015 and even before back then, the vaping 'community' was well aware of diacetyl and most if not all of eliquid companies have discontinued using it. Usually the flavors
52.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
https://www.theverge.com/23277797/mark-zuckerberg-meta-faceb... 'Crack' is the sound that is commonly associated with 'a whip'.
53.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Ironically you're calling out a weird prejudice by showing your own weird prejudice
54.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
> Are you arguing foreign workers in UAE are "immigrants"? They aren't. No, I'm saying exactly the opposite. They aren't, they're non-immigrant temporary workers, thus technically 'expats'. Howeve
55.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Not really. For example UAE is on the list as a top destination for expats. However, laborers from poor countries would probably have a different view on things in terms of career advancement or cultural integration. They're not perman
56.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Did they also ask the laborers from India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, etc.. how it's going in Dubai? Or they're not expats enough? More like.. migrant workers.
57.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
Technically (as far as I know) 'expat' was (supposed to be) used for people who were temporarily relocated to a different country. Even for a longer period. Think someone who's got a longer consulting contract and the big cor
58.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
UAE? Really? Is this some sort of satire? Because I'm honestly laughing.
59.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
How do you feel about the writing style? I was barely able to finish it. I can't say I agree with most of the speculative non-fiction he wrote in that book (which is also a rehash of the ideas in the previous book, Disunited Nations) b
60.
▲
by
decebalus1
4y ago
I remember this from Programming Pearls and I was going to post about it after reading the comments. Great stuff.
More ›