Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
deadbabe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
361.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
What are you looking for in the pixels?
362.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
I want a foldable to make the device smaller in my pocket. Like an iPhone Air that could fold in half like a fliphone.
363.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Are “AI agents” the next “frameworks” in the AI age?
364.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Yea only a matter of time before it’s really really good at PCB routing
365.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Has anyone used AI to manufacture entire physical gadgets of some sort?
366.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
You’re always someone’s exit liquidity.
367.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
It will trigger a race to the bottom. The sweeter the juice the better the squeeze.
368.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
You will be undercut easily by someone running a cheaper LLM setup.
369.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
How do questions like this make it to the top? It is an obvious thing if you search for it or ask AI, but people seem to just ignore those in favor of generating new human responses. Thing is, any time I try to replicate something like that
370.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Given the way the world is now, I will not be surprised if full human cloning and replica people is a thing at some point in my lifetime, just like horses.
371.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
I know how to drop a company’s token costs to zero: treat tokens as a utility same as internet and make engineers pay for it.
372.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Asteroid mining alone could be huge.
373.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
What kind of mods and new features could be added?
374.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
If you want to play “active investor” and pick and choose what companies you invest in, don’t be surprised when you underperform the whole market. SpaceX could rise to be a major winner that makes people a lot of money. And then what? You m
375.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Software Engineering was inherently romantic before AI. People took time to understand the inner world of computers. Some people built brilliant solutions that represented the finest examples of human ingenuity. Knowledge was impressive. Si
376.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
I gave it an image of a complex maze and asked it to solve the maze. It returned the image with the shortest path drawn that not even I had found.
377.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Shocker, when something actually reads your documentation, you will write for that thing. When it clearly doesn’t, you don’t give a fuck.
378.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
What you value personally does not have as much impact on your life as the things people will value about you. In corporate, people value you for the amount of money you can make them.
379.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
It’s popular to trash these IPOs now but I bet if spacex or the big AI companies don’t follow the same pattern as other IPOs and the stocks just keep climbing and making the shareholders a bunch of money, I can’t wait to see people saying s
380.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
It’s not that they can’t think deeply, these are smart people. It’s that there is no reward for doing so and in fact there is punishment . The punishment is that for all the thinking you do, someone else will arrive at the same result
381.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
What if instead of creating weights out of language we could somehow record many events and create weights out of long chains of causes and effects, so that an LLM could predict the next thing to happen?
382.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
If I can get a few more good years in the stock market and save and invest as much as possible I could probably be done in 5 years and not have to work anymore or just work till I’m fired.
383.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
I guess the only “legendary” programmers would be independently wealthy millionaires and billionaires who code for fun. But no one will truly know they are even legendary because no one will care about code the same way.
384.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Will there ever be any more “legendary” programmers ever again now with the rise of AI basically making any coding accomplishments unimpressive?
385.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
In 10 or 20 years when people are still bitching about P/E ratios the price of SpaceX will still be way higher than whatever you buy it at IPO. Either that, or it will be zero. 16 years ago when Tesla IPOed, people still bitched about
386.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
There is nothing to do. Game over. You must rebuild your contacts via some alternative medium of communication.
387.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
It’s not a random comment, it’s a comment from Hackernews which is filled with smart people who are tapped deep into these industries.
388.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
No, Warren Buffet became so rich because he was making deals to pick up stock at favorable prices the public didn’t have access to. You will not be Warren Buffet just by buying after stocks crash.
389.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
Spacex is worth buying. The best chance to make a lot of money is buying stock before the economics make sense. By the time SpaceX looks like a good company on paper with strong profits… the price will be so high you have little chance of
390.
▲
by
deadbabe
4mo ago
One thing I have come to realize, is that worrying about bubbles will keep you poor. If everyone is in the bubble and it pops, everyone is in the same boat, so you’re not really going to be poorer than your peers by comparison. If it’s not
More ›