dd36

64 ms·

781.
by dd36 8y ago
The simplest solution is private rights of collective action in court. The rise of the forced arbitration agreement that has been allowed used to ban class actions is anti-consumer and anti-free market. Markets cannot work correctly if co
782.
by dd36 8y ago
Here is a Hidden Brain episode on it: https://www.npr.org/2017/10/30/559996276/the-trick-to-surviv...
783.
by dd36 8y ago
Yep, facts and allegations. Read the indictments.
784.
by dd36 8y ago
It’s not just when you change jobs. My wife handles large employer groups and the insurance companies ask for a 15% rate increase every year so the employers have to threaten to switch every year to negotiate down then actually switch every
785.
by dd36 8y ago
If Bernie wins running with it as his primary issue, it’s a lot easier to get Congress on board.
786.
by dd36 8y ago
And they can deny service to anyone.
787.
by dd36 8y ago
It’s cumulative. Single use plastic should be highly taxed.
788.
by dd36 8y ago
Tulsi is another Russia-supported candidate per social media trackers. Odd coincidence. Your talking points don't stand up to reading the indictments.
789.
by dd36 8y ago
I never said they were convicted. I said the factual evidence is laid out in the indictments. I said he was their stooge. That doesn't mean he knew he was their stooge.
790.
by dd36 8y ago
Read the indictments. It’s not propaganda. It’s fact. Assange distributed emails stolen by the GRU.
791.
by dd36 8y ago
OP said they won’t go to prison because Trump wasn’t found colluding. It’s nonsensical. As though, Trump not telling Russia what to do means it didn’t happen. We know beyond a doubt Russia interfered. We also know Assange was one of their s
792.
by dd36 8y ago
Read the indictments not alt-right media.
793.
by dd36 8y ago
What? You need to read more. Read the indictments yourself. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/us/politics/russians-indi... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/us/
794.
by dd36 8y ago
He’ll be nominated to the Fed.
795.
by dd36 8y ago
Ummmm Mueller indicted many Russian nationals.
796.
by dd36 8y ago
Where did he mention Trump?
797.
by dd36 8y ago
Then why’d they forbid it?
798.
by dd36 8y ago
Great point.
799.
by dd36 8y ago
Congress doesn’t act in a silo. They did all of that because it’s what their pharma donors demanded.
800.
by dd36 8y ago
Your agent, no matter who is paying them, has a fiduciary duty to you. I’ve bought and sold a lot of property and can guarantee you that the fact that commissions are paid by sellers makes zero difference. Really, it’s coming out of the pur
801.
by dd36 8y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform_in_the... Some of it has been overturned recently but limits have existed for periods of time.
802.
by dd36 8y ago
The KKK certainly is a terrorist group. Alex Jones is being sued and whatever platforms don't stop him from spreading malicious lies could be liable as well.
803.
by dd36 8y ago
Conspiracy theorists have limitations. See Alex Jones getting sued. If you’re actively promoting something false and malicious that harms people, your speech can be restricted. That’s not new.
804.
by dd36 8y ago
Then it’s not decentralized?
805.
by dd36 8y ago
What free speech is he referring to? The only speech I know of that has been censored is terrorist groups. It makes me uncomfortable when I see people here complaining about that.
806.
by dd36 8y ago
I don’t disagree. We need to get money out of politics. It’s been done before. It can be done again.
807.
by dd36 8y ago
The government is propping up the companies because that's what the companies made happen. Your framing suggests that government did this on its own. It did not. The outsized ability of companies to influence the government is the c
808.
by dd36 8y ago
If they were regularly being implicated in terrorist attacks, yes.
809.
by dd36 8y ago
How is it measured?
810.
by dd36 8y ago
“But the SEC, despite its burden to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that Musk violated the Order, fails to identify any other option for who would have that discretion. In fact, there is no other plausible interpretation of the

More ›