dcow

48 ms·

841.
by dcow 3y ago
I never supercharge unless I’m on a road trip and neither do the other Tesla owners I know. We all have wall chargers. So Supercharger use is 100% road trip for my cohort. I also doubt road trips are less than 1% of driven miles. Road trips
842.
by dcow 3y ago
Single family homes in the US tend to be single phase 2 pole 120/240. Some medium density residential, generally high density residential, commercial, & industrial are all 3 phase.
843.
by dcow 3y ago
Where in the world does power cost $0.80 per kWh?!
844.
by dcow 3y ago
Not on a road trip. You primarily charge from 10 to 80% at like 250kw and it takes 15-20 min.
845.
by dcow 3y ago
> There's an embarrassing amount of confusion and misunderstanding in this thread for what is supposedly a technically savvy audience. ? ? ? Let’s correct your misunderstanding, then. 1. The US has 3 phase power. 2. The difference
846.
by dcow 3y ago
Won’t charge times be like sub 10 minutes with the upcoming 1000V power capabilities? Though what would be really clutch about battery swapping is that the overhead of battery maintenance could be offloaded from the owner and amortized into
847.
by dcow 3y ago
Last updated: 2015. Sourceforge. Perhaps packages that are borderline irrelevant should not squat on prime name real estate. Plus cant rip ship as rip-py and still install as rip on the bet that nobody is actually going to be trying to use
848.
by dcow 3y ago
What’s up with this seeming resurgence in interest in IPSec? Did Jason politically/socially mess up? Or are people realizing IPSec solves some novel problem outside the scope of WG?
849.
by dcow 3y ago
I don’t know what the old site was like so maybe this is actually an improvement, but I find this site really difficult to use and possibly even broken. First off it’s really weird to start with a page that links back to the main site and t
850.
by dcow 3y ago
As a non-film person, can someone explain what it means to create the same cinematic ‘look’ as Hollywood feature films ? What is Blackmagic doing when recording video to make the video feel more professional?
851.
by dcow 3y ago
I have a 120hz OLED. Where can I check this out?
852.
by dcow 3y ago
Well I never argued that under the current rules OpenAI shouldn’t have to acquire an initial legal copy of copyrighted works, just like libraries do. So we agree. If I were OpenAI I’d argue that a corpus built for the training of an AI mode
853.
by dcow 3y ago
I think you can reasonably imagine that if content is available in a library then everyone could organize an effort to check out the content and add it to the model. That effort sounds like useless theatre at that point so just let the comm
854.
by dcow 3y ago
You’re lost in the weeds. I know that’s the point it’s why the whole song on the radio thought experiment got brought up. The question was, if an AI model trains on public radio waves, and hears a copyrighted song, is that infringement? My
855.
by dcow 3y ago
Can you point me to where OpenAI admitted they illegally acquired copies of works for training data? I’ve always said “if you acquire the training data legally then all is fine”. I never asserted that anybody definitely did acquire it legal
856.
by dcow 3y ago
> This is the step that OpenAI and other companies are missing. They didn't pay for the content they are using. Where's the evidence that OpenAI pirated all the content they trained models on and didn't access it normally
857.
by dcow 3y ago
I am a product of the impressions left by massive heaps of copyrighted content. One song on the radio is just a rhetorical device. If OpenAI rented all humanity’s media from a library and used them to train an AI model then that seems 100
858.
by dcow 3y ago
Thats not my argument and if you really interpreted my comment as such we are probably at an impasse. If I write a poem and you buy a copy and feed it to your LLM and make a billion dollars I don’t think I’m innately, ethically, or fairly e
859.
by dcow 3y ago
The argument was not "human can do it so should machine qed". The fact that humans so easily do something is a talking point in a large subthread, not the conclusion. Yes, an AI model is just a digital machine that is presently ha
860.
by dcow 3y ago
I don't know if this is tangential or not, but thank you. You've helped me progress my armchair understanding of how we might give the concept of copyright more finesse in the digital age. The insight is that encoding content is
861.
by dcow 3y ago
civil cases is preponderance of evidence. criminal is beyond a reasonable doubt. in any light, yes civil cases are about whether you’re more likely than not to be liable
862.
by dcow 3y ago
Yeah I’m understanding the nuance much more now. There is a difference between: is it okay to use copyrighted content to produce OpenAI’s product, and is a verbatim reproduction of a poem fair use .
863.
by dcow 3y ago
Who says OpenAI pirated it? Unless the content was pirated in the first place simply showing it to an LLM is just like letting your friend borrow your book. When Google crawls websites to build a search index, we don’t expect Google to pay
864.
by dcow 3y ago
So if I hear a song on the radio and it inspires my commercial purposes, then what? Point being: whether a work is used commercially is not relevant. It's common that we think it is, but it's not. I first read about an LRU cache i
865.
by dcow 3y ago
Two things: 1) I’m generally copyleft and would argue that copyright as we know it is nonsensical in the digital era and needs to be entirely rebuilt to make any sense whatsoever. And that as is it harms the commons more than it protects cr
866.
by dcow 3y ago
I personally think our law regarding covers has been heavily influenced by record labels and is wrong about them, in practice. I’ve already heard the original enough times that if I want to hear a string quartet perform Viva La Vida it’s be
867.
by dcow 3y ago
But an AI model doesn't record the original work verbatim with the goal of directly reproducing the original. Aside: and you can bring a camera to a theater and record a movie and use it in a transformative work. And a human could sti
868.
by dcow 3y ago
Covers are generally transformative, right? Edit: I guess even if they are SCOTUS recently decided that even transformative works can infringe if they compete commercially. So the question is not: “did the reciter make money performing”, it
869.
by dcow 3y ago
Exactly. The court would consider other things like the impact of your modified copy and whether it competes financially with the original.
870.
by dcow 3y ago
You can also get “the whole work” by asking another human to recite the lyrics to a song or draw the Finder logo from memory. What’s really happening is that AI models have much better memory than humans and are more precise in their output

More ›