Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dcow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
1008 ms
·
3661.
▲
by
dcow
9y ago
Kotlin has sealed classes. It also has built in generic Pair and Triple containers. But no it doesn't really have algebraic types as you see in Haskell. For example, you can't build a linked list by `cons`ing Ints and Strings and
3662.
▲
by
dcow
9y ago
No so. Many people use it in production. The language has been around for 7 years and a stable 1.0+ release for over a year. It's very much more mature than swift and rust and certainly sibling to go in that regard.
3663.
▲
by
dcow
9y ago
You can even get rid of the final parentheses. (1..100).map { it + 10 }
3664.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
There is no limit on the transfer of such grandfathered domains.
3665.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
No because all of their ads will meet standards. I wouldn't be surprised if a competing lower-quality ad agency sues Google over this.
3666.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
The Japanese potato-chip famine?
3667.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
It's not a distraction think of the question as a general: why should service X be allowed something that service Y is not? There are still really good reasons why X != Y (or conditions that would cause seemingly equivalent X and Y to
3668.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
It might also be another thing if major ISPs didn't have protected monopolies and we could speak with our money. But most of us can't. Not trying to swerve any convoys more just trying to figure out how the head of the FCC could p
3669.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
Great points. I'm personally tying to avoid Google services as much as possible, but I guess I was thinking in a more general context. Even so, your points still stand. (Small obligatory remark: incognito is entirely client side.) The
3670.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
But why should Google be allowed to share your data but not ISPs? Not that I love this move but the reasoning does resonate, or at least make me question if the former law really did anything at all or if FB/Google lobbied it through t
3671.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
There's a typo in section 3.4 paragraph 4 s/bystream/bytestream--unless it's an attempt to be clever.
3672.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
That only happened late 2015. I'm talking about some reddit comments by whomever was in control of pfSense.
3673.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
Not quite. But I am saying I've always found better candidates.
3674.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
Usually when people mention they run pfSense it means, "I heard pfSense is good for security so I use it". If I get that impression in an interview, GG. IMO it's an easy litmus test for netsec/secops roles. If you can&#x
3675.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
Unless I didn't read carefully enough, it's not really an answer to why we hear things. It simply confirms that some people do hear things and reminds us what such phenomena is called. Interesting nonetheless.
3676.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
I just ported my voice number over to fi because as far as anyone could tell that was the direction Google was headed. Now this.
3677.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
So the paper is literally a classic overview of opportunity cost? Zzz
3678.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
I feel like there's less of a spectrum with tobacco: you either smoke enough to get physically addicted or you don't. Some people never do, I guess, but it's not like the tobacco industry is generating cultural and artistic e
3679.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
While each ticket has a fair chance there isn't a 1:1 relationship between tickets and people. I think what's being asked is whether we should correct the outcomes of lotteries in response to opportunity inequality: force a 1:1 re
3680.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
I think the real problem is lack exposure to such miraculous devices outside of Asia-Pacific.
3681.
▲
by
dcow
10y ago
If you factor in the savings on toilet paper and anti-depressants you can raise the bottom line a little..
3682.
▲
Names and Personality
(behindthename.com)
1 points
by
dcow
12y ago
|
0 comments