dclara

13 ms·

91.
by dclara 13y ago
Now the new search engine algorithms are gearing towards NLP led by Google's Hummingbird, see the article here: http://www.wired.com/insights/2014/02/search-today-beyond-op... The direction is right beca
92.
by dclara 13y ago
You are doing something very similar to what I've done for two years. But I'm running a serious business and startup company with patent pending solutions. Another similar thing between us is that when we showed HN for our project
93.
by dclara 13y ago
What's the difference from the online bookmarks such as del.icio.us?
94.
by dclara 13y ago
I can smell a little bit Semantic Web flavor, but this solution made it more automatic. But using a plug-in sounds like too much. About Semantic Web, I've got a short report here: http://bit.ly/JP3KQO . Drop me a line i
95.
by dclara 13y ago
As we learned from Amazon's performance, VC and Wall Street don't care about profit, they only care about sales. As long as the sales and customer based is strong, that's ok. There rest can be adjusted.
96.
by dclara 13y ago
You made the point. Although it was not that explicit, from IE destroyed Netscape, I can see the other intentions. Fortunately, Linux, Apple, Android survives. MS tried to play monopoly which hampered the competition. The same for Google no
97.
by dclara 13y ago
This is interesting. But it's not quite sync with the News on the first page. What do you sort by? If it works well, I'd like to use it.
98.
by dclara 13y ago
Thank you. For the long-term medium data center, it's a good choice. But other then the hardware disk space part, there are the hosting service part which at least provides a stable Linux instance and static IPs, and it' must be u
99.
by dclara 13y ago
Well said. Java in 1998 was already overwhelming although there were lot of debating. The entire system of Java is so solid, especially in handling multi-threading. Coding is not that simplified, but very robust. Comparatively, using GO and
100.
by dclara 13y ago
Agree.
101.
by dclara 13y ago
Nice!
102.
by dclara 13y ago
Funny scenario, but I can imagine. This is also my concern along with the rest of the things. Can we anticipate that we have so many apps installed on our phone and keep looking for the one we need to control every time? Especially, we&#x27
103.
by dclara 13y ago
I got your point, very constructive. Here is my thought: 1. Bridge between the RF module and the internet If all the processing is done on the host pc side, leave the device only having the sensor to detect the state and being driven by th
104.
by dclara 13y ago
Very nice tool, talk anonymously and in conference. But my IE 11 does not pop up the flash screen.
105.
by dclara 13y ago
Very nice thoughts. I kind of agree with you on the common standard protocols, so I didn't count non-wifi RF in. I think my 2.4G wireless handset of the home phone or wireless mouse are examples. But even printers are using wifi now. I
106.
by dclara 13y ago
Thank you very much for your input. Looks like a lot of people have this kind of needs. Usually I have to create multiple email accounts to have multiple roles of me. I'll do some research on SnapChat, but why do it like it? That'
107.
by dclara 13y ago
Very good solution outlook. The main concern I have is: "Design for scale of everything", given the example of 200 bulbs. That's exaggerated, but how about you have 200 of IoT at home? Do you use 200 or 100 apps to control th
108.
by dclara 13y ago
Very good and practical requirement proposal, especially with the low interference with people. The common protocol part is also very important. I guess mostly will use Wifi, is that true? WiMedia and ZigBee are too weak to control remotely
109.
by dclara 13y ago
Interesting rules. I can feel they are right. But if all the UIs are not surprising, people will be pretty bored and hard to remember to come back. This is a dilemma for my website UI design.
110.
by dclara 13y ago
I agree. Are there any examples of multiple-identity system or "share as"?
111.
by dclara 13y ago
Nice UX analysis. Thank you! May seek your help later. http://kck.st/JNqv8z
112.
by dclara 13y ago
Working with software product companies, we always debated on the product is "technology driven" or "market driven". Back to the days of using EJB, often times we were technology drive (not all). That's why we have
113.
by dclara 13y ago
The cheat is that he used a separate process to build hash table for real time look up, which is different from reading the data from the file at run time.
114.
by dclara 13y ago
I got your point now. So set top box, internet TV died. Now it's the time for smart TV which is controlled by the smart phone. I'm pretty tired about smart phone, too. If TV is controlled by PC, I can play internet game on it and
115.
by dclara 13y ago
To my understanding, Google will devote their energy to the new market, such as robot and home automation, plus Glass and self-driving car, which is already enough to deal with for a software company. No need to compete in the smart phone m
116.
by dclara 13y ago
Don't quite agree with you on that they don't want to be in goods business. They just bought Nest. It depends on Google's overall strategy to occupy the future market. Smart phone will have less margin and too much competitio
117.
by dclara 13y ago
This looks more clear. They pretty much got everything back except the tax liability payment plus the valuable patents remained. Not a bad deal. And I think it's a positive move to put the hardware design and manufacturing back to the
118.
by dclara 13y ago
You have a point and insight. This is critical to a lot of Android users. I sort of believe what you said because other sources also implied Android's head is gone and it's under ChromeOS now. we can imagine what will happen. I tr
119.
by dclara 13y ago
How about $3B cach minus $1B debts, make it $5B loss?
120.
by dclara 13y ago
I got confused by you mixing smart TV with Xbox. I still think Smart TV concept and architecture is pretty failed from the market. From SetTopBox to Apple TV to Google TV, whenever I saw there is a box attached to the TV which can receive t

More ›